Live data from Hacker News

Weird-Looking Freak Saves Apollo 14 (1971)

rollingstone.com

41–50 of 116 posts

Re: Weird-Looking Freak Saves Apollo 14 (1971)

#41
post #36
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

HN's software should probably replace non-trailing exclamation points with something rather than nothing. I took the Extra bit out of the title for now, since it isn't needed and I suppose might confuse younger readers.

What does this "Extra!" bit mean?

When breaking news came out a newspaper would sometimes publish an extra edition to go out in the afternoon. The paperboys would stereotypically say, “Extra! Extra! Read all about it!”

Re: Weird-Looking Freak Saves Apollo 14 (1971)

#42
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oh and obviously TeX will always be considered classic 20th century code literature. And probably git too, especially as it's very useful and almost forces the casual user to appreciate the poetry of its data structures.

> And probably git too Not sure about this, given the fact that this exists:: https://git-man-page-generator.lokaltog.net/

That reads like Vogon poetry.

Re: Weird-Looking Freak Saves Apollo 14 (1971)

#43
This is the first time in many many months I’ve read an article from begin to end, in one sitting. And then I looked the date it was written: 1971.

We don’t have shorter attention spans. We simply cannot handle the utter crap that passes by articles today.

Re: Weird-Looking Freak Saves Apollo 14 (1971)

#44
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As far as I understand, he quit his public life when someone hunted down and published his real name and address. He removed his website and github, which contained his various writings, some of which had names with "tutorial" or "guide" in them but all of which were at least 80% works of literature and at most 20% works of technical documentation. Not sure I would call it "ragequitting". Virtually all his works were…

> Not sure I would call it "ragequitting". Expecting to maintain a large public reputation and stay anonymous and then stopping when the facade is cracked is pretty unrealistic.

Why is it? Why should it be?

What's so hard about understanding somebody's desire for their art to be in the world without violating the boundary between that and their personal life?

Re: Weird-Looking Freak Saves Apollo 14 (1971)

#45
There's mention of him in this article regarding the source code (printed on white and green paper). He wrote about 2000 lines for the Lunar Module.

I often wonder how many lines of Javascript I load every day just to browse the web and watch images fade in and out and animate etc. and all the megabytes of framework garbage I load just to display some content. By comparison, it's depressing.

Re: Weird-Looking Freak Saves Apollo 14 (1971)

#46
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oh and obviously TeX will always be considered classic 20th century code literature. And probably git too, especially as it's very useful and almost forces the casual user to appreciate the poetry of its data structures.

> And probably git too Not sure about this, given the fact that this exists:: https://git-man-page-generator.lokaltog.net/

I recommend reading the first commit in the git git repo

Re: Weird-Looking Freak Saves Apollo 14 (1971)

#47
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As far as I understand, he quit his public life when someone hunted down and published his real name and address. He removed his website and github, which contained his various writings, some of which had names with "tutorial" or "guide" in them but all of which were at least 80% works of literature and at most 20% works of technical documentation. Not sure I would call it "ragequitting". Virtually all his works were…

> Not sure I would call it "ragequitting". Expecting to maintain a large public reputation and stay anonymous and then stopping when the facade is cracked is pretty unrealistic.

Sure, unrealistic. But legit. And I'm not sure much rage was involved.

Re: Weird-Looking Freak Saves Apollo 14 (1971)

#48
post #43

This is the first time in many many months I’ve read an article from begin to end, in one sitting. And then I looked the date it was written: 1971. We don’t have shorter attention spans. We simply cannot handle the utter crap that passes by articles today.

Perhaps the articles from 1971 that get reposted today represent the top 1% of articles from then, making articles from then seem so much better than now?

Re: Weird-Looking Freak Saves Apollo 14 (1971)

#49

> Eyles and some of his fellow Consciousness IIIers regard computer programming as a fine craft that might some day be elevated to the status of an art. “It’s possible to envision a time when there are professors of the literature of computer programming. Maybe some programmers will be minor poets of the 20th Century. The trouble is that programs are written in a language there’s no audience for. It’s like Nabokov’s…

Tbh, for any piece of great poetry or prose or code, there are nine others which are crap, as noted by Sturgeon's Law. The steaming piles of yesterday have been forgotten, with only the memorable works remaining; thus creating an illusion of a Golden Age.
Post reply on HN