Earlier quoted context omitted.
> There is virtually no nuance in the reporting. If you want to read ad-supported news, then you will be stuck with news that is intended to have the lowest possible production costs, and garner the most possible eyeballs. This business does not support nuance, because nuance is expensive and less audacious. Nuanced reporting exists on essentially every topic that it is possible to care about, but it is often in smal…
the issue with the "i dislike mainstream media" argument is that its usually made by people who have a simultaneous and unspoken desire to have the "correct" information and opinions gift wrapped and personally delivered to them.
Facebook quitters report more life satisfaction, less depression and anxiety
241–250 of 433 posts
Re: Facebook quitters report more life satisfaction, less depression and anxiety
#242Earlier quoted context omitted.
So read something like The Economist or the paper version of the NYT?
The NYT I definitely now class with all the rest. In my opinion The Economist stands alone as the only publication I can trust to be nuanced and informative.
Re: Facebook quitters report more life satisfaction, less depression and anxiety
#243Earlier quoted context omitted.
Books definitely won't help you satisfy impulsive urges for 24/7 live updates on such minutiae; but then again, what practical use would you have for trying to stay perpetually up to date on the current status of the impeachment process?
The impeachment is already forgotten.
Re: Facebook quitters report more life satisfaction, less depression and anxiety
#244Re: Facebook quitters report more life satisfaction, less depression and anxiety
#245My main observation is that I’m happy getting back onto the things where I exert some control. Those with little control are harder to stomach:
1. TV news is one of the hardest. I can silence the adverts but the news itself is a horror. In most “items” I see blatant political manipulation, viciousness without apparent reason, ignorance and stupidity so deep that I’m dumbfounded. So much propaganda and disinformation. Can’t find any channel that is much good, not controllable. (Also newspapers, for them add plenty of hysteria.)
2. eMail has also proved surprisingly hard. The hard part is all the spam. (I don’t use surveillance capitalist mail servers, run my own.) I decided to go through my spam traps first. So much utter rubbish that it’s put me off. Outnumbers the good stuff even after automated pre-winnowing. Would be better if I could find a way to retaliate effectively against those who pay for spam.
3. Facebook is quite easy. I have a number of measures in place that put my content under my own control. Not that hard to get back into. (Though I find more people, a lot, are using it less and bailing out altogether as time goes on. It’s dying.)
4. Twitter is dead easy. You choose who you follow. That gives you a lot of control, so can be pleasant to use.
5. The Internet (WWW) in general is not too bad. I have a variety of tools to control and exclude those who want to watch everything I do. Gives me control.
My take away: The media you can control can be rewarding and worthwhile.
Re: Facebook quitters report more life satisfaction, less depression and anxiety
#246Re: Facebook quitters report more life satisfaction, less depression and anxiety
#247Re: Facebook quitters report more life satisfaction, less depression and anxiety
#248I'd really like to quit Facebook but I'm holding out for three reasons: a) Facebook Chat is a way to get a hold of friends or vice versa. SMS is often slow (less of a sense of urgency I guess), and not everyone has my number or even use SMS. b) The network effect. It's a great way for introverts such as myself to get in contact with someone without the "what's your number?" question. c) Events. If I didn't have Faceb…
Re: Facebook quitters report more life satisfaction, less depression and anxiety
#249Earlier quoted context omitted.
The NYT I definitely now class with all the rest. In my opinion The Economist stands alone as the only publication I can trust to be nuanced and informative.
I'd say the Economist, Bloomberg, Bellingcat, and fivethirtyeight all have good signal to noise ratios.
I find Frontline to be some of the most nuanced, deep dive journalism which is readily available.