Live data from Hacker News

SoundCloud raises $75M from SiriusXM

techcrunch.com

51–60 of 227 posts

Re: SoundCloud raises $75M from SiriusXM

#51

When I was a truck driver, Satellite Radio was practically a necessity. Sure I loaded up my ipod with music, but the selection was too damn limited and I would tire of hearing the same songs over & over again. The best case scenario for FM radio (when you would finally find something that you could tolerate) was 1 hour. 1 hour of variety to stave off bordem and try to save your sanity. The effective range of the FM s…

Stories like this is why I love reading HN comments. Thanks for sharing your experience!

Re: SoundCloud raises $75M from SiriusXM

#52
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

US and Canada only.. sigh

This might actually be the one case where this limitation is not entirely artificial. :-) The SiriusXM sattelites are in an inclined eliptical orbit with the highes point being over the norther hemisphere. This is the so called Molniya orbit, named after the first Soviet sattelites using it: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molniya_orbit (Soviet Union had a lot of territory in higher latitudes where geostationary satt…

And in addition population density is higher in Europe than U.S., menajng that the density of FM radio (and modern attempts like DAB/DAB+ etc.) and mobile cell base stations is also higher, thus those provide more competition.

Re: SoundCloud raises $75M from SiriusXM

#54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wow. I know like every new car comes with a trial but I didn’t realize people actually activated it.

Even more impressive than the market cap previously referenced is their actual business is vastly superior to Spotify. Sirius 2019: $7.8b in sales, $1.7b operating income Spotify 2019: $6.7b in sales, -$73m operating income Spotify's market cap is supported by a fantasy that one day, somehow, if they get big enough they might generate a real profit to support their Wile E. Coyote valuation (don't look down). So for e…

Man, I did not know these facts. I would have never guessed.

Re: SoundCloud raises $75M from SiriusXM

#55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not the person you're asking, but it seems it's very easy to get to 6 or 7: Netflix, Prime, Hulu, HBO2Go, AppleTV+, Disney+, Spotify, SxM, etc

I think like the person you replied to I misread is as having 6 or 7 SxM subscriptions, which sounded like a big flex "I have 6, maybe 7, cars". 6 or 7 paid subs sounds reasonable.

> Aside from Netflix, SxM is probably the one I would cancel last of the group.

I read it that way as well right up until I read the rest of the comment where the last sentence made it clear.

Re: SoundCloud raises $75M from SiriusXM

#56
post #34

https://outline.com/yhGKb2 -- GDPR, and otherwise reader respect.

Ever since techcrunch implemented their GDPR "conforming" cookie "banner" I refuse to open their site. Can we have a guideline that says "link will be replaced if target site follows dark patterns and same quality content is available elsewhere"?

Re: SoundCloud raises $75M from SiriusXM

#58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have probably 6 or 7 paid subscriptions for my personal use. Aside from Netflix, SxM is probably the one I would cancel last of the group.

What are your use cases? 6 or 7 seems like a lot.

I had 6 for a while. Three cars, two home stereos, and a handheld. Most of those eventually became obsolete as the app and Sonos integration became usable, so now it's just in the cars.

Re: SoundCloud raises $75M from SiriusXM

#59
I feel like I'm in the minority of those who love SoundCloud. It's one the very few places for indie music makers and DJs to showcase their work that otherwise may not necessarily be published via the official publishing channels. That includes e.g. long running DJ mixes, not exactly the type of material for the official release bureaucracy and associated costs.

The only problem with SoundCloud is that instead of following the Spotify model, i.e. get listeners to pay for listening, they could have done it the other way around: get makers pay some nominal fee for hosting. Which they kind of did in the beginning but gradually drifted towards the listener-subscription model. As a paid music hosting service they'd at least provide an alternative for specific class of artists, i.e. those who make music for the love of it and want to be heard via unofficial channels.

SC failed to become one. They've had some back and forth and experimentation with pricing and subscription models over the years but never settled at anything targeted clearly and unambiguously. The current offerings are confusing and inconvenient for all classes of users. There's now an all-time upload limit for non-paying makers, and ads for non-paying users. What's the point of this? Getting both makers and listeners pay you? Sounds like a poor plan to me, that leads to nowehere.

Re: SoundCloud raises $75M from SiriusXM

#60
post #6

I stopped liking soundcloud when I realized that 99.999999% of my followers are bots. I dont need a bunch of followers that mean nothing. I would rather have 0 than 100 fake followers. I also realized that at my production rate, its cheaper to just use Distrokid and throw things out on iTunes than to hope for discovery on soundcloud. Now I just use sound cloud to distribute examples of hardware mods or how a piece of…

If bot followers made you leave SoundCloud, why were you there in the first place? Does the number of followers you have change how you use the service?
Post reply on HN