Live data from Hacker News

Becoming a high performing software developer working from your bedroom

zephony.com

131–140 of 308 posts

Re: Becoming a high performing software developer working from your bedroom

#131

Is there a reasonably priced VESA-monoitor-arm attachable whiteboard out there? Something like this[1] that's cheaper, or should I just build my own? [1] https://www.ergotron.com/en-us/products/product-details/98-4...

No idea, but if you can't think of anything else there's bound to be an iPad mount and a whiteboard around that size you could combo up

Re: Becoming a high performing software developer working from your bedroom

#132
post #128

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Firstly, it was "low to medium" risk, not "low" risk. Secondly, pretty much any reputable ETF (or combination of ETF's) can quite easily achieve this over 30 years.

Most ETFs have returned about 7-8 % average long term (before allowing for inflation). Not a bad return, but very different over 20 years from 10-15%

7-8% is still nothing to scoff at. Better than a measly 1% in a savings account :D

Re: Becoming a high performing software developer working from your bedroom

#133
post #32

I have switched from working in bedroom, to working in a dedicated office, to working in a co-working space, to working from home in a dedicated office. 1. Working from the bedroom is hell. It's fun for the first few months but then you are likely to have severe eye strain and become very sleepy. 2. Working from a real office sets boundaries and forces a schedule. You have to wake up at xx:xx time and drive to office…

> 1. Working from the bedroom is hell. It's fun for the first few months but then you are likely to have severe eye strain and become very sleepy.

Do you mean actually working from bed? If not, I don't understand this. I work from a spare bedroom and it's as good as any office. It is an office, in a way.

Re: Becoming a high performing software developer working from your bedroom

#134
When people envision working from home, it seems that "wearing pajamas" is a common trope.

That is not a good idea.

The thing about clothes is that they're part of a routine. I.e. I wake up, make some tea, put some fresh clothes on, turn on my computer, and now I'm in work mode. Ideally. In practice it doesn't always work like that, but it's still far better than waking up and just sitting down in front of my computer. Having a routine is really important for not getting lost.

They don't have to be business clothes or whatever, but just something fresh for the day. I'm the sort of nerd that wears chinos and a button up shirt even though I work from home and don't have video calls.

---

In addition, blurring work and personal life isn't good. You ideally don't want to work in the same room that you sleep, but this can't be avoided sometimes.

Variety is also key. Sometimes I go out and get work done from a local cafe for a change of pace.

Re: Becoming a high performing software developer working from your bedroom

#135

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Studio apartments aren't a thing anymore? Where did I claim that? I think you’ve misread. I said _some_ young people. How have you expanded that to think I was writing _all_ young people? Not everyone can afford a studio to themselves. This does not imply studios do not exist.

A studio apartment is a one room apartment that usually has living space, bed and kitchen utilities all in one room. I’m not sure if you understood that. People tend to go for them because they’re cheaper.

[deleted]

Re: Becoming a high performing software developer working from your bedroom

#136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would never use those to write something important in a notebook. I did this and left it in my bag, the sun shone on the bag and because of the heat most of my notes got erased. Well because friction = heat, so it was the same thing.

You can get it back by throwing it in a freezer, at least I was able to when I should prove someone wrong... :-) (pilot frixion, blue, bought in Norway)

Here's[1] a proof I recorded a long time ago. Enjoy my notes on virtual memory.

[1]: https://youtu.be/hM4-4G36H7U?t=31

Re: Becoming a high performing software developer working from your bedroom

#137

Earlier quoted context omitted.

vanguard funds, but the good ones I have know of require a $500k initial investment.

which funds require this?

He's talking about the "Admiral" class of funds which have lower fees but higher minimums. (And most are $50k min, not 500k). Most of these funds can be bought at lower minimums too, they just have higher fees.

Re: Becoming a high performing software developer working from your bedroom

#138

> And most importantly, turn off your WhatsApp and Instagram notifications on your phone. This one thing will make you high performing software developer working from anywhere in the world.

Jokes on you, I hardly get one Instagram notification a day.

Re: Becoming a high performing software developer working from your bedroom

#139

Earlier quoted context omitted.

vanguard funds, but the good ones I have know of require a $500k initial investment.

Why is the initial investment so high? Is there a reasoning behind it?

He's talking about a specific class of funds that are sold generally to institutions. Think buying funds in "wholesale"; they have low fees, high minimums. Those same funds can be bought "retail" though, with normal fees and typical minimums ($3k-$10k).

Re: Becoming a high performing software developer working from your bedroom

#140
post #124

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Firstly, it was "low to medium" risk, not "low" risk. Secondly, pretty much any reputable ETF (or combination of ETF's) can quite easily achieve this over 30 years.

There is no reputable ETF that will give you 15% return. Even 10% real return is incredibly unlikely.

I don't think 'unreputable' is fair - they're just a different (not 'low - medium'!) risk profile.
Post reply on HN