Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: A open source Heroku-like PaaS that runs on your server

repobus.com

11–20 of 29 posts

Re: Show HN: A open source Heroku-like PaaS that runs on your server

#11
What part of this is open source? I don't see any Github or other links to said source.

It looks like you're going to eventually build a company around this and maybe you will think about releasing the source then? In which case, the title is still misleading.

I do appreciate that you've released documentation ahead of the product, it does indicate that you understand how important that aspect of the business will be.

Re: Show HN: A open source Heroku-like PaaS that runs on your server

#13

How is it different than Dokku?

Dokku is available now. This landing page says RepoBus will have "Deploy to multiple servers", "Aggregated logs + search", and "Aggregated metrics + alerts" (and maybe others) that I think Dokku doesn't have.

Re: Show HN: A open source Heroku-like PaaS that runs on your server

#14
What's the point running something like heroku on your own server. The whole reason to use Heroku is that they take care of a lot of stuff you don't need to like updating servers, certain aspects of security, making sure there is no downtime and so on. If you run it on your own server you need to take care of all those things yourself, then why not use just a simple aws instance?

Re: Show HN: A open source Heroku-like PaaS that runs on your server

#15
post #8

See also: CapRover. Beats dokku all to hell, in my experience. https://github.com/caprover/caprover Be careful, their (CapRover) embedded NetData image has the NetData upstream defaults for spyware, so you are advised not to enable it (use of their embedded NetData is optional). https://github.com/caprover/caprover/issues/553 It is straightforward to set up CapRover with an ssh deploy key and a webhook for deploying…

The github issue you linked to and the discussion it contains is the reason I am sticking with dokku. The CapRover maintainer seems to argue in bad faith and not have the users best interest at heart.

Re: Show HN: A open source Heroku-like PaaS that runs on your server

#17
post #3

How is it different than Dokku?

Perhaps to answer the question, one might ask: How is Heroku different from Dokku?

That difference is very clear: you still need to buy and manage your own (cloud) server to run dokku on.

Re: Show HN: A open source Heroku-like PaaS that runs on your server

#18
post #3

How is it different than Dokku?

Perhaps to answer the question, one might ask: How is Heroku different from Dokku?

Having used both extensively, the answer is as simple as one is private/hosted and the other is open/self-hosting.

Heroku is easy, but expensive. Dokku is more work/management, but cost-effective.

Re: Show HN: A open source Heroku-like PaaS that runs on your server

#19
People at Convox[1] and Remind101 are doing similar open-source work.

Convox's business model is selling you the managed version of their open source rack. We've been using Convox in production for over 3 years now and we've had pretty good success with it. It's not perfect but the UX improvement for developers when building docker images, promoting new builds or rolling back cannot be understated.

Remind101 has built Empire[2] which is not a product they actually sell but rather the tool they use internally and have decided to open-source it. Empire is a little less managed and while it allows you to run services on it it requires you to have your own solution for building and hosting docker images.

[1] https://convox.com/, https://github.com/convox/rack

[2] https://github.com/remind101/empire

Re: Show HN: A open source Heroku-like PaaS that runs on your server

#20
post #15
post #8

See also: CapRover. Beats dokku all to hell, in my experience. https://github.com/caprover/caprover Be careful, their (CapRover) embedded NetData image has the NetData upstream defaults for spyware, so you are advised not to enable it (use of their embedded NetData is optional). https://github.com/caprover/caprover/issues/553 It is straightforward to set up CapRover with an ssh deploy key and a webhook for deploying…

The github issue you linked to and the discussion it contains is the reason I am sticking with dokku. The CapRover maintainer seems to argue in bad faith and not have the users best interest at heart.

Agree. It does not inspire confidence to recommend a product and quickly follow it up with worries about spyware.

And dokku works well for my use cases.

Post reply on HN