Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah but unlike a mortgage (secured against one static asset i.e. a house), the article assumes most of this debt will be issued against the strength and quality of a company's various recurring revenue streams (even speculating that different components of this could be financed separately to try and account for the varied risk). Just need to make sure you don't end up with financers/banks/rating agencies colluding…
The article seems to advocate for exactly what you’re warning about: Why not go straight to securitizing senior tranches of your recurring revenue, and moving it off your balance sheet? ... (one paragraph later) ... On the other side, imagine how much investor interest you could get in a diverse basket of recurring revenue from, say, 10 different startups that’ve all raised from Tier 1 VCs. People talk about how grea…
It still wouldn't get to the level of the housing crisis until those securities were packaged into much larger CDOs and refinanced based on the fraudulent risk ratings.