There was a pic of an older guy, but what was unsettling was the woman peeking over his shoulder; like a friend or a family member, leaning into the photo. Her eyes were melting into black and white streaks curling down over her sagging cheeks; her smile was perfectly white, and just a little too long. I refreshed on instinct, and haven't seen anything like it since.
This person does not exist
91–100 of 185 posts
Re: This person does not exist
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
But what's the incentive for doing that? What are you offering to those who work on adtech for them stop or to those who do work for $EvilCorp.
Moral decency doesn't warrant reward.
Re: This person does not exist
#93The background, clothing and especially other people in the image are still a dead giveaway that it's not a real person. It's kind of weird how the algorithm borks something relatively simple as the texture of clothing.
Yeah, you'd think that some GAN scheme would be able to weed that out?
Re: This person does not exist
#94Earlier quoted context omitted.
The horror.
This one is sure to haunt me: https://imgur.com/a/lGsRX3n
Re: This person does not exist
#95Re: This person does not exist
#96So, the specific person may not exist, but likely someone very, very similar in appearance does. I've come across people in life that I would have sworn were twins. I'm curious how combinatorically low the number of facial features need to be before people resemble one another.
Re: This person does not exist
#97Re: This person does not exist
#98Now try this: http://whichfaceisreal.com/
It only took me a while to notice that this is an actual human face in the background, just photographed from a peculiar angle and bearing a peculiar expression - not a neural network artifact.
Re: This person does not exist
#99I remember the site hotornot.com ; will there be another one, BotOrNot.com ?
Re: This person does not exist
#100I have a question - When generating a new person (or whatever it is that does not exist) can you know that it isn’t like any of the images that went into the training data set? How likely is it for it to actually exist after all?
The model has 18x512 parameters, and all 9000 parameters are 32-bit floats. Even assuming only 16 bits of randomness for each parameter (to keep them small enough, so you don't get too wild, because the center of 0 is a pretty homogenized face), 16^9000 is a lot of permuations of faces. They will, of course, borrow from all of the 70k faces on Flickr that power StyleGAN, in varying degrees.