From the article: "One of the big things that makes Experts Exchange unique is a patented system that requires askers to select their best answer." A great example of how broken the patent system is.
Expert Exchange gets narky after snub from Q/A site review
11–20 of 141 posts
Re: Expert Exchange gets narky after snub from Q/A site review
#12http://www.experts-exchange.com/Virus_and_Spyware/Anti-Virus...
30 day trial?! Subscribe now?! Who do they think they're kidding? Or really: who actually uses this thing? Before the other sites came along, it was merely a nuisance that showed up in your search results, mixed in with something that would actually help. (Interestingly, now the problem is StackExchange content-farms...)
This is exactly the kind of thing that inspired StackOverflow (a fact this post even references!) and it's a key factor in its massive growth and adoption on the part of fed up programmers and sysadmins.
Re: Expert Exchange gets narky after snub from Q/A site review
#13Re: Expert Exchange gets narky after snub from Q/A site review
#14Re: Expert Exchange gets narky after snub from Q/A site review
#15Pretending like you took part in the interview. I can only describe it to my self as...Desperation.
Maybe this is whine your-self some more recognition tactic? I've been out of the game since I was 6 years old, I can't be sure.
Re: Expert Exchange gets narky after snub from Q/A site review
#16Experts Exchange is borderline spam, to put it mildly. They hide the answer at the very end of an enormous scroll (of course after they try to sell you via a pop-up). A reasonable user has no clue that the answer is on the page. When I have made it all the way down, I have received a quality solution perhaps 5 out of 500 times. Stack Overflow realized there was a quality problem with the existing tech Q&A services an…
Re: Expert Exchange gets narky after snub from Q/A site review
#17One of the big things that makes Experts Exchange unique is a patented system that requires askers to select their best answer. Most Q&A sites (StackExchange included) let the community vote for the best answer, when really the person whose opinion matters most is the one who asked the question. StackOverflow allows for both community voting AND for the original asker to indicate which answer was the best answer. I s…
Perhaps I should patent my faith system that allows for negative numbers. Seems reasonable...
Re: Expert Exchange gets narky after snub from Q/A site review
#18Experts Exchange is borderline spam, to put it mildly. They hide the answer at the very end of an enormous scroll (of course after they try to sell you via a pop-up). A reasonable user has no clue that the answer is on the page. When I have made it all the way down, I have received a quality solution perhaps 5 out of 500 times. Stack Overflow realized there was a quality problem with the existing tech Q&A services an…
I always considered it spam. I wish Google allowed me to globally exclude the domain from my searches. Moreover, given what I could read it didn't look anymore promising or valuable that the various sites that come up, discuss a problem to a dead-end with no resolution (usually posted by a clueless Microsoft "MVP"). No thanks.
You may have missed the news about this plugin for Chrome: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/nolijncfnkgaikbjbd...
Re: Expert Exchange gets narky after snub from Q/A site review
#19I plan on asking quora what "narky" means
Re: Expert Exchange gets narky after snub from Q/A site review
#20Experts Exchange is borderline spam, to put it mildly. They hide the answer at the very end of an enormous scroll (of course after they try to sell you via a pop-up). A reasonable user has no clue that the answer is on the page. When I have made it all the way down, I have received a quality solution perhaps 5 out of 500 times. Stack Overflow realized there was a quality problem with the existing tech Q&A services an…
I always considered it spam. I wish Google allowed me to globally exclude the domain from my searches. Moreover, given what I could read it didn't look anymore promising or valuable that the various sites that come up, discuss a problem to a dead-end with no resolution (usually posted by a clueless Microsoft "MVP"). No thanks.
(someone posted this on HN recently)
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/02/new-chrome-extension-...