Honestly, the moon is a much better goal.
James Lovelock: 'I Would Not Waste My Fortune on Colonizing Mars'
11–20 of 330 posts
Re: James Lovelock: 'I Would Not Waste My Fortune on Colonizing Mars'
#12He may be a smart dude, but this answer is out there: > "DER SPIEGEL: Cancer is a silent killer that might get diagnosed long after the exposure, when it is too late. > Lovelock: I've had 10 cancers in the last few years and it hasn't been very bad. They just appear and grow. If you go to a good oncologist nearby, they'll take it out. It's just unfortunate for people who let it happen and it grows and grows until it'…
I stopped reading the article there. I am not interested in reading the crazy ramblings of someone disconnected from reality.
Re: James Lovelock: 'I Would Not Waste My Fortune on Colonizing Mars'
#13> I mean, nowadays, I think middle class and fairly wealthy people don't die of cancer. Sounds like James Lovelock has been pretty lucky in his experience with cancer...
Re: James Lovelock: 'I Would Not Waste My Fortune on Colonizing Mars'
#14> I've had 10 cancers in the last few years and it hasn't been very bad. They just appear and grow. If you go to a good oncologist nearby, they'll take it out. It's just unfortunate for people who let it happen and it grows and grows until it's inoperable. I mean, nowadays, I think middle class and fairly wealthy people don't die of cancer. Is this (roughly) true? I've never heard this before, and I want to believe.
Re: James Lovelock: 'I Would Not Waste My Fortune on Colonizing Mars'
#15Re: James Lovelock: 'I Would Not Waste My Fortune on Colonizing Mars'
#16Honestly, the moon is a much better goal.
Re: James Lovelock: 'I Would Not Waste My Fortune on Colonizing Mars'
#17He may be a smart dude, but this answer is out there: > "DER SPIEGEL: Cancer is a silent killer that might get diagnosed long after the exposure, when it is too late. > Lovelock: I've had 10 cancers in the last few years and it hasn't been very bad. They just appear and grow. If you go to a good oncologist nearby, they'll take it out. It's just unfortunate for people who let it happen and it grows and grows until it'…
“out there” is a pretty charitable description. I stopped reading the article there. I am not interested in reading the crazy ramblings of someone disconnected from reality.
Re: James Lovelock: 'I Would Not Waste My Fortune on Colonizing Mars'
#18He may be a smart dude, but this answer is out there: > "DER SPIEGEL: Cancer is a silent killer that might get diagnosed long after the exposure, when it is too late. > Lovelock: I've had 10 cancers in the last few years and it hasn't been very bad. They just appear and grow. If you go to a good oncologist nearby, they'll take it out. It's just unfortunate for people who let it happen and it grows and grows until it'…
Re: James Lovelock: 'I Would Not Waste My Fortune on Colonizing Mars'
#19Honestly, the moon is a much better goal.
Maybe if your plan is to have a base where most goods are transported from Earth. If you want self sufficiency Mars is much better in terms of available raw material.
Re: James Lovelock: 'I Would Not Waste My Fortune on Colonizing Mars'
#20Honestly, the moon is a much better goal.
How so? Mars has an atmosphere unlike the moon, it has water in some form and quantity and has approximately the same length of the day as Earth, plus it has gravity much closer to Earth than what the moon has.