Earlier quoted context omitted.
Stop spreading FUD. There have been a couple hundred deaths. Even if the numbers have been minimized, compare this to the 40'000 deaths due to the flu in the US every year ...
deaths are absolutely the wrong metric to focus on at this point. as you said, the normal flu is plenty deadly. even if we assumed that variable was break-even, what matters now is the rate of infection transmission and growth. right now it is still exponential. we can only hope for the bend in a sigmoid curve to come soon, but we haven't seen it yet. now on top of the fact that it is still exponential is the greates…
I don't think it's the right metric to focus either.
The survivability rate once infected is probably the most important.
I believe that medias business model (pay per click) force them to jump on and exaggerate any threat so as to get more views. It's not the first time and sadly not the last that we see such a thing.
I could be wrong but I don't think it's the end of the world ;-)