31–40 of 135 posts
Unlike most regex helpers, in this one you would start with the text you want to filter/parse and then it would suggest you possible extractions.
Do you know any alternatives?
Nobody pointed it out, but there's also https://regexr.com/ It's how I learned regex years ago, and I still use it today to test/build more complex patterns.
Nobody pointed it out, but there's also https://regexr.com/ It's how I learned regex years ago, and I still use it today to test/build more complex patterns.
Nobody pointed it out, but there's also https://regexr.com/ It's how I learned regex years ago, and I still use it today to test/build more complex patterns.
one suggestion would be to mention clearly which tool/language is being used, regex has no unified standard.. based on "Cheatsheet adapted" message at the bottom, I think it is for JavaScript. I wrote a book on js regexp last year, and I have post for cheatsheet too [3]
[3] https://learnbyexample.github.io/cheatsheet/javascript/javas...
This is really cool! 2 points: 1. it fiddled with my back button which is a bit annoying 2. a better email sample is ^[^@]+@[^@]+\.[^@]+$ which removes the 2 ampersands problem.
So sundar.pichai@google is technically a valid address (whether .google has any MX records is another matter)
Regex shouldn't really be used for email addresses anyway because the only reliable way to authenticate an email address is to literally send an email to that address.