Live data from Hacker News

IBM Names Arvind Krishna CEO

bloomberg.com

71–80 of 158 posts

Re: IBM Names Arvind Krishna CEO

#71
post #5

So, not working with any insider knowledge (I work for Red Hat, but reading the news like everyone else), but the other news is that Jim Whitehurst is going to be the IBM President. Hopefully a big push in keeping Red Hat's culture relevant and influencing IBM to transform.

This is SOP for borgifying acquihires. IBM isn't capable of operating in a cohesive way. Shuffling the org chart won't change that.

>This is SOP for borgifying acquihires

Translation?

Re: IBM Names Arvind Krishna CEO

#72

Can we derive anything meaningful from the fact that this Hacker News item almost gets no response and just a few comments?

HN is SV centric where IBM is an East coast tech company. HN is startup centric where IBM is over 100 years old. HN is very B2C centric where IBM is almost exclusively B2B. HN doesn’t deal too much with enterprise companies.

Fuck, I had no idea IBM was found in 1911. That's mental.

Re: IBM Names Arvind Krishna CEO

#73
post #22

Another Indian-born tech CEO? It's incredible. IBM joins Microsoft, Google, Adobe, Nokia, and Harman in this regard. Also, MasterCard and PepsiCo (until 2018). I wonder how much it's a cultural thing.

This is a biased, but honest observation that I'd like to share. I've been working for a big corp for about 5 years now. I was born in a SE Asian country and came to the US for college. I have worked with a lot of India-born people. As a fellow foreigner and as an Asian, I can tell that more often than not Indian people are bolder and more aggressive in asking for what they want (e.g., one of my Indian colleague aske…

This comment seems to be assuming that Indians are over-represented at the C-suite, but that seems doubtful. Given the huge proportion of the tech workforce that Indians occupy, the number of CEOs being discussed seems perfectly... average. If I were to draw any conclusions at all, it would be that Indians are just like everyone else in tech, not the opposite.

Re: IBM Names Arvind Krishna CEO

#74
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

ALSO. the people you are describing are (I'm guessing) immigrants. Meaning they are a subset of people from their home country with the internal initiative, drive, and resources to move halfway around the world and make their way in a culture besides the one they grew up in

This is under appreciated. I spent significant time living and working in China and it’s HARD. I came back to the US with a MUCH deeper respect for any immigrants I work with. Everything is much more confusing and frustrating.

The language / the cultural barrier isn't as high as it is for an American living in China though. I've grown up speaking English and watching a lot of American / British movies and TV, reading a lot of english literature. I assume this is not the case for most Americans with Chinese culture.

There's definitely a culture shock when you first move here and are figuring stuff out - How do you order food at a subway or a chipotle? (not a big deal anymore given the explosion of these restaurants in India in the last few years). Why is called Cilantro and not Corinander? How do I get a phone when I don't have any credit history at all? What is a turn-pike?

Re: IBM Names Arvind Krishna CEO

#76
post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is under appreciated. I spent significant time living and working in China and it’s HARD. I came back to the US with a MUCH deeper respect for any immigrants I work with. Everything is much more confusing and frustrating.

The language / the cultural barrier isn't as high as it is for an American living in China though. I've grown up speaking English and watching a lot of American / British movies and TV, reading a lot of english literature. I assume this is not the case for most Americans with Chinese culture. There's definitely a culture shock when you first move here and are figuring stuff out - How do you order food at a subway or…

I lived in both UK and Germany for about 4 years on each. My native language is Spanish (Mex) and I found it more difficult to adapt/blend with Britons than with Germans. Even though my English is Ok and my German is terrible...

Re: IBM Names Arvind Krishna CEO

#78
post #77

Is IBM even relevant anymore or are they simply another McKinsey type consulting firm Who happens to sell mainframes to banks?

if generating 80 billion in revenue and making your shareholders money by selling mainframes to banks is irrelevant then I wouldn't want to be relevant.

I continue to be puzzled by the derision that companies on this site get just because they do regular business.

Re: IBM Names Arvind Krishna CEO

#79
post #52
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Satya wasn't an engineer at microsoft. This is true, strictly speaking. But (also strictly speaking) he was an engineer > Nadella attended the Hyderabad Public School, Begumpet[7] before receiving a bachelor's in electrical engineering[8] from the Manipal Institute of Technology (then part of Mangalore University) in Karnataka in 1988.[9][10] Nadella subsequently traveled to the U.S. to study for an M.S. in compute…

Nadella was a Program Manager at Microsoft.

What’s your point?

Re: IBM Names Arvind Krishna CEO

#80
post #56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Also couldn't they basically sit on their rear and collect on mainframe contracts from now until the end of time?

No. There's immense pressure on the mainframe market; there's a constant drumbeat of mainframe-killer tech that's definitely better/faster/stronger (and, on rare occasions, is...at least for some narrowly defined workload). IBM has to work very hard keep mainframes competitive technology, and even harder at sales/marketing to fend off the alternatives.

What competitive technology are you thinking here? IBM z-series mainframe carry enormous amounts of transaction workloads today. They are deeply embedded in most of the Fortune 1000 companies. Hitachi was the only real competitor left standing and they dumped their mainframe business in 2017 since they were unable to get traction outside of Japan.

In the early 90's, there were efforts by customers to get rid of their mainframes which put IBM on the ropes then, until Lou Gerstner took over as CEO and stabilized the business. It's not like these transaction workloads can be easily ported elsewhere since some of them go back as far as the early 1970's. Those customers able to ditch their mainframes did so a while back. The rest of these systems will remain due to risks and costs of migrating to a suitable alternative. It's not a huge revenue stream for IBM, but a very profitable one.

Post reply on HN