Live data from Hacker News

New Chrome extension: block sites from Google’s web search results

googleblog.blogspot.com

41–50 of 226 posts

Re: New Chrome extension: block sites from Google’s web search results

#41
post #6

>...explore using it as a potential ranking signal for our search results Democratic censorship.

What's the difference in Google censoring spam and users censoring spam?

I'll pass along an anecdote from Gmail, which also uses explicit user feedback to label spam emails. Some people come to Gmail and say "Why did you block the [mass low-quality] email that I sent?" It's a pretty good answer if the reply is "Enough people marked your emails as spam that the emails were considered spam."

The hope is that users are savvy enough that we can get a good signal out of the block signal.

Re: New Chrome extension: block sites from Google’s web search results

#42
post #20

1. http://bit.ly/gTADhE 2. Click Install, close page 3. Open each of the links below in a new tab, click block on the first result 4. Win. http://www.google.com/search?q=Mahalo http://www.google.com/search?q=ehow http://www.google.com/search?q=experts-exchange http://www.google.com/search?q=livestrong.com http://www.google.com/search?q=answerbag http://www.google.com/search?q=bills.com http://www.google.com/search?q=…

I'd put 'osdir' on that list...

Re: New Chrome extension: block sites from Google’s web search results

#43
post #20

1. http://bit.ly/gTADhE 2. Click Install, close page 3. Open each of the links below in a new tab, click block on the first result 4. Win. http://www.google.com/search?q=Mahalo http://www.google.com/search?q=ehow http://www.google.com/search?q=experts-exchange http://www.google.com/search?q=livestrong.com http://www.google.com/search?q=answerbag http://www.google.com/search?q=bills.com http://www.google.com/search?q=…

I used to write for eHow and the like, and I fully endorse blocking them. Thanks for the list!

Re: New Chrome extension: block sites from Google’s web search results

#44
Assuming it's a normal extension and has to abide by the same rules that Non-Google Authored extensions do, the extension manifest indicates the extension doesn't have access to do any cross domain posts so all the filtering is done client side. Digging a little deeper, it looks like the blocked sites are stored in Chrome's LocalStorage, which if memory serves me correctly is somehow isolated per extension.

It should be relatively easy to listen in on the background page while the extension is running and write a script to extract the list of blocked sites or update it with a master list so you don't have to block dozens or hundreds of sites manually.

Not that I think everyone should blindly block everything everyone else does on HN; I personally loathe Experts Exchange, but I do find an answer I needed from them now and then.

I was more curious than anything.

Update: As "dsl" posted above, it does look like the extension makes a call out to a Google Endpoint to record the block as well, but I don't believe that call actually filters the data for you. That's still done client side. So it's probably best not to call the end point directly or update the blocked sites list directly, but actual use the extension as intended?

Re: New Chrome extension: block sites from Google’s web search results

#45
post #6

>...explore using it as a potential ranking signal for our search results Democratic censorship.

That's like calling the current situation "technical censorship" since websites are ranked by how they perform on the SEO level. They won't ban sites from google, they will re-arrange who is shown higher (or lower) based on what the users like.

Google has always been in the business of linking search terms with the corresponding informations that users want to see, this is no different.

Re: New Chrome extension: block sites from Google’s web search results

#46

Looks promising, but I'm unsure about the security angle. Google has just added a way for anyone to "DDos" competing websites into oblivion. I hope there are measures in place to prevent that.

They aren't yet using the data for ranking.

They are or probably would be doing that. See this comment by Matt Cutts: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2218531

Re: New Chrome extension: block sites from Google’s web search results

#47

Assuming it's a normal extension and has to abide by the same rules that Non-Google Authored extensions do, the extension manifest indicates the extension doesn't have access to do any cross domain posts so all the filtering is done client side. Digging a little deeper, it looks like the blocked sites are stored in Chrome's LocalStorage, which if memory serves me correctly is somehow isolated per extension. It should…

Yes they block client side (several posts from matt confirm it in this thread).

But you mention something important; for me I don't want to 100% block most of those websites, but to give them lower priority (never in my top 10 for exemple). Like you, as much as I hate Experts exchange sometimes they do have the answer when no one else does. This extension sems to solve that by giving a "show" link to display hidden results (when there are any).

Re: New Chrome extension: block sites from Google’s web search results

#49
I just wanted to say thanks to all the people on Hacker News who asked for this option. We'll look at offering a "block site" option directly in the search results over time, but it takes longer to write, test, and launch that code.

In the mean time, use this extension to clean up your own search results and tell us which sites you don't want to see in Google.

Post reply on HN