IBM's Watson starts on Jeopardy Tonight
jeopardy.com
IBM's Watson starts on Jeopardy Tonight
1–10 of 154 posts
Re: IBM's Watson starts on Jeopardy Tonight
#2Re: IBM's Watson starts on Jeopardy Tonight
#3Re: IBM's Watson starts on Jeopardy Tonight
#4Re: IBM's Watson starts on Jeopardy Tonight
#5Re: IBM's Watson starts on Jeopardy Tonight
#6Much of success on Jeopardy is not just deciphering clues in the answers, but your timing on ringing in to give the question. I'd imagine a machine could get really good at getting the timing down. Does Jeopardy have a way of varying who rings in first to keep things more fair?
If it rings in every time there's no way it will win.
Re: IBM's Watson starts on Jeopardy Tonight
#7Much of success on Jeopardy is not just deciphering clues in the answers, but your timing on ringing in to give the question. I'd imagine a machine could get really good at getting the timing down. Does Jeopardy have a way of varying who rings in first to keep things more fair?
Click timing is indeed very important but I do not think Watson has any special advantage there.
Re: IBM's Watson starts on Jeopardy Tonight
#8Is there somewhere to watch this online?
You'll also be able to see a full transcript of the board, as well as all questions provided by contestants, at www.j-archive.com.
Re: IBM's Watson starts on Jeopardy Tonight
#9Much of success on Jeopardy is not just deciphering clues in the answers, but your timing on ringing in to give the question. I'd imagine a machine could get really good at getting the timing down. Does Jeopardy have a way of varying who rings in first to keep things more fair?
Remember that Watson also has to depress a physical button (the same buzzer everyone else uses). The eye to finger path for humans is about 200ms. It probably takes about 100ms for Watson to physically press the button. So Watson is about 100ms faster. But that also gives humans about a 100ms window in which to beat Watson. This means that you need to start your press 100-200ms before Trebek finishes his last word.
That's pretty good sized window for most people given you are reading the question along with Trebek. If the person who turns the light on is very consistent, I think a human who is good at this could consistently beat Watson.