Live data from Hacker News

U.S. Gov Privacy Watchdog Under Pressure to Recommend Facial Recognition Ban

thehill.com

11–20 of 115 posts

Re: U.S. Gov Privacy Watchdog Under Pressure to Recommend Facial Recognition Ban

#12
post #9

I don't think this sort of thing is constructive. Biometrics is GOING to happen. I'd rather companies be (potentially) honest, rather than move on the next thing and not publicize it.

Since when has a for profit corporation been completely honest with the public, especially when it comes to something as controversial as this.

Re: U.S. Gov Privacy Watchdog Under Pressure to Recommend Facial Recognition Ban

#13
post #2

Good but don't exempt the government. Many local cities are building out vast networks. Including my very own Miami Beach Police Department.

If you're out in public then what privacy are you expecting?

I'd expect the same privacy we were getting before such technology came along.

Re: U.S. Gov Privacy Watchdog Under Pressure to Recommend Facial Recognition Ban

#14
post #12
post #9

I don't think this sort of thing is constructive. Biometrics is GOING to happen. I'd rather companies be (potentially) honest, rather than move on the next thing and not publicize it.

Since when has a for profit corporation been completely honest with the public, especially when it comes to something as controversial as this.

Well, if it's BANNED we KNOW they'll lie about it.

Re: U.S. Gov Privacy Watchdog Under Pressure to Recommend Facial Recognition Ban

#15
post #2

Good but don't exempt the government. Many local cities are building out vast networks. Including my very own Miami Beach Police Department.

If you're out in public then what privacy are you expecting?

1. What one expects != what one thinks is right.

2. I suppose you would be ok, then, with a police officer tailing you everywhere you go, recording everything you do, everywhere you go, everything you say, and to whom, peering in the windows of your home if you forget to keep your blinds drawn? Just in case that information happens to be useful to a government at some point in the future?

Re: U.S. Gov Privacy Watchdog Under Pressure to Recommend Facial Recognition Ban

#16
post #14
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Since when has a for profit corporation been completely honest with the public, especially when it comes to something as controversial as this.

Well, if it's BANNED we KNOW they'll lie about it.

There are processes to punish people and companies if they violate a ban and get found out. Works for theft, murder and other things.

Re: U.S. Gov Privacy Watchdog Under Pressure to Recommend Facial Recognition Ban

#17
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, if it's BANNED we KNOW they'll lie about it.

There are processes to punish people and companies if they violate a ban and get found out. Works for theft, murder and other things.

Doesn't really work for corporations. (See: Dieselgate). They don't get caught for years, if ever.

Re: U.S. Gov Privacy Watchdog Under Pressure to Recommend Facial Recognition Ban

#18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you're out in public then what privacy are you expecting?

I'd expect the same privacy we were getting before such technology came along.

Which is none? Anyone can walk up to you on the street and take your picture.

Re: U.S. Gov Privacy Watchdog Under Pressure to Recommend Facial Recognition Ban

#20
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'd expect the same privacy we were getting before such technology came along.

Which is none? Anyone can walk up to you on the street and take your picture.

And I'd be fine with that whenever that would happen by a person organically making the decision to do so.
Post reply on HN