This is great. I always wonder why amazon itself is so useless in this space. The only thing you can go is price and reviews there, without any good comparisons between products.
Show HN: I built a website to better compare USB-C hubs found on Amazon
251–260 of 280 posts
Re: Show HN: I built a website to better compare USB-C hubs found on Amazon
#252Earlier quoted context omitted.
This one is my favorite site of this type: https://www.productchart.com It has an awesome interface and covers the US and the UK.
I've been working for 2 years on a successor for productchart! Modern UI and KISS, check it out here : https://picked.cc
Re: Show HN: I built a website to better compare USB-C hubs found on Amazon
#253Earlier quoted context omitted.
The Thunderbolt capable docks on Amazon are still listed as USB-C because consumers seem to think it’s all about cable shape. That said, there are plenty of dual USB-C connector, dual HDMI 4K@60hz port, dongles designed for Mac on Amazon. I think this is the most recent addition: https://smile.amazon.com/gp/product/B07RH9HF4R/ ”Satechi Aluminum Type-C Dual HDMI Adapter 4K 60Hz with USB-C PD Charging — Stunning dual H…
Two 4k @ 60 Hz is either Thunderbolt (which is fine for Macs but has a price and I would rather buy like https://www.monoprice.com/product?p_id=38575 or https://www.monoprice.com/product?p_id=31261 instead of a noname company) or DisplayLink which is to be avoided at all costs. This hub is Thunderbolt as can be deciphered from "Does not support MacBook models with single USB-C port" (see https://support.apple.com/en-…
May I ask why, or is it the details you have later in your post?
Re: Show HN: I built a website to better compare USB-C hubs found on Amazon
#254Re: Show HN: I built a website to better compare USB-C hubs found on Amazon
#255Thanks so much people, I really appreciate all your feedback. I read all comments, already answered to some them. I will try to respond to every one, but can't promise that. I noted down all the feedback and ideas for improvement and will tackle those points: * better filters (video resolution, displayPort, card readers, power delivery) and sorting by price, "no-feature" search * Better and cleaner design * Moar data…
Are you talking about adding hubs that aren't available on Amazon? When I started to use my 13" mbp as a desktop station I was surprised how hard it was to find a decent hub, and I couldn't find anything on Amazon that worked. I tried several hubs that seemed to work, but they interfered with wifi.
I ended up with a CalDigit TS3 Plus, and it's been really good so far. I would not have found that on a site that only reviews Amazon products, but I would have really appreciated an actual recommendation rather than just a large set of products to compare.
Re: Show HN: I built a website to better compare USB-C hubs found on Amazon
#256Re: Show HN: I built a website to better compare USB-C hubs found on Amazon
#257https://www.amazon.com/Anker-PowerIQ-Charging-MacBook-Surfac...
Re: Show HN: I built a website to better compare USB-C hubs found on Amazon
#258Re: Show HN: I built a website to better compare USB-C hubs found on Amazon
#259Earlier quoted context omitted.
Two 4k @ 60 Hz is either Thunderbolt (which is fine for Macs but has a price and I would rather buy like https://www.monoprice.com/product?p_id=38575 or https://www.monoprice.com/product?p_id=31261 instead of a noname company) or DisplayLink which is to be avoided at all costs. This hub is Thunderbolt as can be deciphered from "Does not support MacBook models with single USB-C port" (see https://support.apple.com/en-…
> or DisplayLink which is to be avoided at all costs May I ask why, or is it the details you have later in your post?
Re: Show HN: I built a website to better compare USB-C hubs found on Amazon
#260Earlier quoted context omitted.
> or DisplayLink which is to be avoided at all costs May I ask why, or is it the details you have later in your post?
DisplayLink transports video over the USB bus, rather than using one of the alt modes of USB-C. As you can imagine, this introduces compression artefacts and substantial CPU overhead. It's passable for web browsing. Watching any sort of video is painful and forget about any sort of gaming or latency sensitive application