Live data from Hacker News

State of Independent SaaS [pdf]

static1.squarespace.com

1–10 of 88 posts

Re: State of Independent SaaS [pdf]

#2
> More than 25% of respondents have been running their business for 5-10 years, which is longer expected given the relative newness of SaaS, and the high chance a startup fails in its first one or two years.

Could this be survivor-ship bias. If you failed your SaaS venture in less than a year, you are less likely to be part of this survey.

Re: State of Independent SaaS [pdf]

#3
> and the high chance a startup fails in its first one or two years.

I never understood why people like to spread this "fact" around. Of course a company will fail in it's first years, if not, it's a company that is at least not failing.

Also, it means nothing, not all companies are started equal and these statistics mix everything and everyone in the same basket, there is too much noise involved for this metric to mean anything.

Re: State of Independent SaaS [pdf]

#4
Some surprises for me -

1. Why is VC funding so down the rank compared to self funding, friends and family, angels and even debt? Is it probably because VC funding expects a >100x exit and most SaaS probably can't deliver that? Or are SaaS founders turning away from VC for ideological reasons (like want to enjoy the process instead of rushing to justify a valuation?)

2. 50%+ people pursued ideas which were not their own itch to scratch.

3. 30%+ didn't validate before building. 20%+ just asked their audience. Effectively, 50%+ just jumped into it without doing any significant and rigorous testing. Probably because the cost of entry and failure is too low?

4. 74% don't require a CC to start a trial. (Either infra costs are very low or competition is intense?)

5. 80% don't offer a forever free plan.

6. Most founders don't know their website visitor to trial conversion rates.

7. "Asking for a credit card before a free trial has almost no correlation with revenue growth."

Re: State of Independent SaaS [pdf]

#5
post #4

Some surprises for me - 1. Why is VC funding so down the rank compared to self funding, friends and family, angels and even debt? Is it probably because VC funding expects a >100x exit and most SaaS probably can't deliver that? Or are SaaS founders turning away from VC for ideological reasons (like want to enjoy the process instead of rushing to justify a valuation?) 2. 50%+ people pursued ideas which were not their…

how would you go about validating an idea if you don't have at least a prototype to show potential customers ? This has been suggested to me on many occasions but I fail to understand how it works in practice. I'm not being sarcastic I'm genuinely interested because if this is possible it would save me a whole lot of time and headaches.

Re: State of Independent SaaS [pdf]

#6
post #4

Some surprises for me - 1. Why is VC funding so down the rank compared to self funding, friends and family, angels and even debt? Is it probably because VC funding expects a >100x exit and most SaaS probably can't deliver that? Or are SaaS founders turning away from VC for ideological reasons (like want to enjoy the process instead of rushing to justify a valuation?) 2. 50%+ people pursued ideas which were not their…

>Why is VC funding so down the rank compared to self funding, friends and family, angels and even debt?

Mental health and emotional attachment I guess, working at a scale you're comfortable working at. The tools, frameworks etc. you prefer, and the community around those can all contribute to developer happiness.

So if you optimize mainly for growth you might throw many things out of the window. I think the more developer you are as an entrepreneur the more you may want to stay within a scale that's comfortable for you.

The VC way seems to be more suited for more marketing oriented entrepreneurs who may not even code and develop an emotional attachment towards their tools, their joy may come more from growth aspect, so basically the opposite of what a dev might want.

Re: State of Independent SaaS [pdf]

#7
post #4

Some surprises for me - 1. Why is VC funding so down the rank compared to self funding, friends and family, angels and even debt? Is it probably because VC funding expects a >100x exit and most SaaS probably can't deliver that? Or are SaaS founders turning away from VC for ideological reasons (like want to enjoy the process instead of rushing to justify a valuation?) 2. 50%+ people pursued ideas which were not their…

Note that almost 90% didn't raise funding at all. And of those who did raise, 70% raised less than $500K. About 70% also had 4 or fewer employees including themselves. In other words, these are mostly pretty small operations.

Look at the hours worked as well. 80% work less than 50 hours a week. And the businesses are very geographically dispersed. Net Net. These are not anything like typical SV startups.

Re: State of Independent SaaS [pdf]

#8
post #5
post #4

Some surprises for me - 1. Why is VC funding so down the rank compared to self funding, friends and family, angels and even debt? Is it probably because VC funding expects a >100x exit and most SaaS probably can't deliver that? Or are SaaS founders turning away from VC for ideological reasons (like want to enjoy the process instead of rushing to justify a valuation?) 2. 50%+ people pursued ideas which were not their…

how would you go about validating an idea if you don't have at least a prototype to show potential customers ? This has been suggested to me on many occasions but I fail to understand how it works in practice. I'm not being sarcastic I'm genuinely interested because if this is possible it would save me a whole lot of time and headaches.

Depends on the idea, but there's a lot you can do before you write a single line code.

1. Of your friends/network, pick 5-10 people who could be potential customers. Ask them.

2. Think of a way to scrape emails addr of people who could be potential customers. Ask them.

3. Same on Linkedin.

4. Build a landing page, buy traffic from G and FB, look at time spent on your landing and CTRs to a signup page which then collects emails of interested parties ("We'll let you know once the Alpha is out").

5. Find a blog with potential customers, pay money to run some article on it that relates to your idea, with links to your landing page. Look at open rates of the article itself, and CTR to the landing, CTR on the landing, etc.

6. Create a public group on FB for people that could be potential customers. (Try to) create content for it, try to get people to join (maybe with ads).

All of these are highly noisy, but it's something. Also you could learn something unexpected, like: "oh, I get your idea, but we use already use X for that", and you didn't know about X, or you didn't know it could be used for that. This happened to me several times. Don't be overconfident in your Google-fu, it's a long tail world, and you may not be able to guess all the relevant keywords/marketing/angle that a competitor could be under.

Re: State of Independent SaaS [pdf]

#9
post #2

> More than 25% of respondents have been running their business for 5-10 years, which is longer expected given the relative newness of SaaS, and the high chance a startup fails in its first one or two years. Could this be survivor-ship bias. If you failed your SaaS venture in less than a year, you are less likely to be part of this survey.

At the bottom of the PDF they say that the people who filled out the survey got "Marketing Extras". To get a good range of respondents you would have to give out cash to "Verified" SaaS executives during 2019. Which is way more work and doesn't generate any revenue for Stripe/Basecamp

Re: State of Independent SaaS [pdf]

#10
post #4

Some surprises for me - 1. Why is VC funding so down the rank compared to self funding, friends and family, angels and even debt? Is it probably because VC funding expects a >100x exit and most SaaS probably can't deliver that? Or are SaaS founders turning away from VC for ideological reasons (like want to enjoy the process instead of rushing to justify a valuation?) 2. 50%+ people pursued ideas which were not their…

> Why is VC funding so down the rank compared to self funding, friends and family, angels and even debt?

This is not a representative sample of all SaaS businesses out there. It was run by the founders of Microconf, and their audience is mostly self-funded startups and solopreneurs. Naturally you will see little VC funding there. As ghaff mentioned in another comment, this is not a sample of typical SV startups.

Post reply on HN