Live data from Hacker News

TripAdvisor cuts hundreds of jobs after Google competition bites

bloomberg.com

131–134 of 134 posts

Re: TripAdvisor cuts hundreds of jobs after Google competition bites

#131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not to get too off topic, but it's clearly a self inflicted problem, where nobody would complain about spending money on space force uniforms if space force's existence made any sense.

Why does militarization of space not make sense? It makes a lot of sense unless you're a pacifist.

It's because as soon as people militarize space nobody can get anything done in space.

In space you are so much more vulnerable than in any conceivable environment on earth. Survival depends on others not having layers of other agendas, several of which may be to find ways to kill you.

Imagine how much space exploration will cost if not only do you need to get to space, but you need to bring defensive and offensive weapons as well.

Re: TripAdvisor cuts hundreds of jobs after Google competition bites

#132

Google is pretty much taking your shit nowadays and there is nothing you can do about it. That shit is either a company you built or a product of theirs that you used. They are not a search company, they are a conglomerate. They'll buy you or break you. It's funny when they fail though isn't it? Remember Google+? Who lead that initiative? What a travesty that was. Outside of Gmail, Google's UIs really do suck. But ba…

I wouldn't call them "a typical business", given their magnitude and ability to distort the Web

Re: TripAdvisor cuts hundreds of jobs after Google competition bites

#133
post #83
post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> They'll buy you or break you. You say that like they are equally bad for you. Being bought out is great for the previous owners. (Otherwise, they wouldn't sell.)

Otherwise, they wouldn't sell. The only reason not to sell is because you believe Google can't break your business before you get a better offer or you can IPO. If you think they can do that then you don't really have much of a choice. Founders tend to factor this in to their thinking from the start. "Acquired by Google" is often considered a desirable exit goal.

Mostly agreed.

IPO is kind of a sale too. (Though it's relatively easy for founders to keep control in an IPO, given the market's acceptance of weird share voting arrangements.)

Re: TripAdvisor cuts hundreds of jobs after Google competition bites

#134
post #118

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Remember Google+? Who lead that initiative? What a travesty that was. Outside of Gmail, Google's UIs really do suck. I don't think that was an issue with the UI. Their UI was quite nice and the overall UX was too. Thing was they started by driving up hype, then letting a lot of people in but not everyone. Those lots left because it didn't have the main drive of a social media platform. Users. Their friends weren't a…

> Their UI was quite nice and the overall UX was too. No their UI sucked. One third of the page was occupied by a stupid header you couldn't even reduce or remove with a CSS hack. I hated it. Fortunately now, most websites doing that tend to disappear. Also, the content of the page itself was 1/3 wide, which is ridiculous when one is trying to read a long blog post. The Google+ was a disaster UI wise, I would not be…

>No their UI sucked. One third of the page was occupied by a stupid header you couldn't even reduce or remove with a CSS hack. I hated it.

What? I must have missed that because I don't remember seeing it.

>Also, the content of the page itself was 1/3 wide, which is ridiculous when one is trying to read a long blog post.

Which would be much wider than the actual content on it's main competitor facebook.

Post reply on HN