Live data from Hacker News

Google backtracks on search results design

techcrunch.com

21–30 of 356 posts

Re: Google backtracks on search results design

#21
post #6

Don't care. Haven't used Google since they put social engineering and ad revenue ahead of search quality and usability When I peek in from time to time, it looks intolerable compared to DDG's clean results.

I tried using duckduckgo but gave up after I kept getting irrelevant results for simple queries

After many tries at ddg, I am using startpage.com since it uses anonymized google results. Still far from perfect, but the best I have found for now.

Re: Google backtracks on search results design

#22
post #17

When will we realize that adwords and everything it inspired was a wrong turn for the internet? I’d much rather pay a monthly fee to get the services I want. I understand that Google and Facebook have gone too far down this path, and they will say such a service is not as profitable, but ultimately their business model seems unsustainable. People search for the truth, and while you can sell anybody anything, the trut…

I’m not willing to pay anything. The internet was built on good will, fun, and generally good intent.

Now that it’s a mechanism of commerce it’s attracted the worst of the worst who have no ethics. Ethics courses will be taught in response to bad actors, not in anticipation of.

I’m aware the cats out of the bag and all of the high paid engineers need to make a living somehow. I just don’t think it’s about the consumer anymore, if it ever was. It will get worse before it gets better and I’m checking out.

I’m an older engineer and going to school for HVAC/R. I plan to do it on the side and eventually start a business. I’m pulling the rip cord.

One thing I will say about the blue collar world: they’re better about ego management. Many young engineers I meet are highly paid and treated well, sometimes rarely disagreed with. I can’t help but think that fosters some bad habits.

Re: Google backtracks on search results design

#23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In other words, an obfuscation of functionality that clearly shows their attempts at behavioural conditioning.

More like- how often do you edit a URL in the bar on mobile? It's a pain in the ass.

Every single time someone im's me some url with a bunch of tracking garbage after the ?

Re: Google backtracks on search results design

#24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In other words, an obfuscation of functionality that clearly shows their attempts at behavioural conditioning.

More like- how often do you edit a URL in the bar on mobile? It's a pain in the ass.

I do often enough.

Re: Google backtracks on search results design

#25
post #3

I’ve been on the test for this design since October 4, 2019, so I’ve actually gotten used to it! But it’s probably a good thing for them to backtrack. I wonder what went wrong in their clearly lengthy experiment about how this would perform.

Someone was better at persuasion than engineering and got approval to put it into production, ignoring potentially negative A/B test results or flawed feedback methodology.

Re: Google backtracks on search results design

#26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In other words, an obfuscation of functionality that clearly shows their attempts at behavioural conditioning.

More like- how often do you edit a URL in the bar on mobile? It's a pain in the ass.

Not really. I do it regularly.

Re: Google backtracks on search results design

#27
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I opened Chrome on a friends phone (first time on Chrome mobile in years) and was shocked to see the url bar is no longer editable. It just gave me a weird context menu with a copy icon. I guess they really want to funnel everyone through search...

> It just gave me a weird context menu with a copy icon. Share, copy, and edit icons. While I'm not a big fan of it, it probably fits the frequency and relative friction of interactions on mobile better than the previous UI.

There is no other reason, than their desire to "herd" uesrs, why they could not have the additional options to share/copy and have it behave like any other edit control, i.e. you can tap the other icons to copy or share, and more importantly still start editing it without going an extra step.

Re: Google backtracks on search results design

#28
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Right next to that copy icon is a pencil - the edit icon.

Yes: you cannot DIRECTLY edit the URL in the navbar. Nor, for that matter, can you click, ctrl-A (yes, Virginia, I have and use a Bluetooth keyboard). Instead it's click, then Copy Icon. Utterly blinkered. Oddly: Incognito mode is not (yet) crippled in this manner. Don't get me started on pull-to-nuke-whatever-you'd-been-composing-or-losing-your-place-in-infernal-scroll

> yes, Virginia, I have and use a Bluetooth clipboard

I'm assuming from context that your mean keyboard, but the idea sounds kind of cool so I have to ask: any chance this is a term for a a bluetooth device solely designed to facilitate copy-pasting between other devices?

Re: Google backtracks on search results design

#29
post #10

While I’m glad they reverted, the doublespeak is absurd. As if they didn’t know users would hate it. User experience had nothing to do with this. It was all about revenue. The main question after this is what user hostile move will they attempt next? Without major changes all over the company I don’t see how Google will get better.

Don’t they have 100,000 employees that could’ve told them this just as well? You’re right this isn’t about UX. It’s about ego.
Post reply on HN