23andMe lays off 100 people as DNA test sales decline
91–100 of 458 posts
Re: 23andMe lays off 100 people as DNA test sales decline
#92> Wojcicki has theories Think the obvious one is that the results are shared and whether someone is a criminal or not (or will be one in the future), people are not particularly comfortable with sharing to parties they didn't initially trust it to for the purposes they trusted it for. Anecdotally, I bought a 23andme kit (just the genealogy one) but never submitted it because the labeling was to send it to the lab in…
Re: 23andMe lays off 100 people as DNA test sales decline
#93Everyone paying attention the pattern of layoffs? Ebay, Mozilla, DigitalOcean, 23andMe, Intel... Pay down your credit card debt and make sure you have at least 6 months of expenses in the bank, if you're young and haven't been through this before.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-09-23/world-s-w...
Re: 23andMe lays off 100 people as DNA test sales decline
#94>Wojcicki has theories I have a theory for her. It's too expensive. It was really cheap when I got it (on deep discount) but there are discounts, and then there are discounts. The discounts in the last few years have been very weak. For the past few years I would have bought it for as many as five family members if only it had gone back to the price I got it for. And now that the privacy concerns have understandably…
Re: 23andMe lays off 100 people as DNA test sales decline
#95What's the max conceivable penetration here? 20%?
Re: 23andMe lays off 100 people as DNA test sales decline
#96> Wojcicki has theories Think the obvious one is that the results are shared and whether someone is a criminal or not (or will be one in the future), people are not particularly comfortable with sharing to parties they didn't initially trust it to for the purposes they trusted it for. Anecdotally, I bought a 23andme kit (just the genealogy one) but never submitted it because the labeling was to send it to the lab in…
Honestly, I would also say that a partial reason why these would've dropped is that everyone who can do it has done it. You only need these kinds of results once because your DNA doesn't change. I knew people who were giving or had gotten these as gifts, but those are one-off purchases. And if you've heard of people doing it then you'll do it too but that's also a one-off. I don't think I'd personally benefit because…
Re: 23andMe lays off 100 people as DNA test sales decline
#97I can't believe they've received three quarters of a billion dollars of investment.
The largest chunk, $300 million, was a buy-in from GlaxoSmithKline, with which it purchased access to the database and research. Given the slowing pace of drug development, that was probably a very good "investment" by GSK. But maybe it was a bad one for 23andMe if it limits the scope of deals they can do with other pharmaceutical companies.
Re: 23andMe lays off 100 people as DNA test sales decline
#98> Wojcicki has theories Think the obvious one is that the results are shared and whether someone is a criminal or not (or will be one in the future), people are not particularly comfortable with sharing to parties they didn't initially trust it to for the purposes they trusted it for. Anecdotally, I bought a 23andme kit (just the genealogy one) but never submitted it because the labeling was to send it to the lab in…
Honestly, I would also say that a partial reason why these would've dropped is that everyone who can do it has done it. You only need these kinds of results once because your DNA doesn't change. I knew people who were giving or had gotten these as gifts, but those are one-off purchases. And if you've heard of people doing it then you'll do it too but that's also a one-off. I don't think I'd personally benefit because…
Re: 23andMe lays off 100 people as DNA test sales decline
#99I'm gonna give you some slack here, Anne, but TBH Silicon Valley executives don't really understand what these words mean.
“I think the tech world needs to own this[sic] better communicate privacy standards to build trust,” she said. “I want to jump in and really own it.”
Or maybe instead of jumping in with your billionaire executive pants on, Anne, you could listen. People are sick of being told what's being done to them. You didn't miscommunicate, you screwed up. People are pissed off.
Re: 23andMe lays off 100 people as DNA test sales decline
#100Earlier quoted context omitted.
Honestly, I would also say that a partial reason why these would've dropped is that everyone who can do it has done it. You only need these kinds of results once because your DNA doesn't change. I knew people who were giving or had gotten these as gifts, but those are one-off purchases. And if you've heard of people doing it then you'll do it too but that's also a one-off. I don't think I'd personally benefit because…
That's not quite true. Your DNA doesn't change, but 23andMe only does partial sequences on those test kits. As new techniques become available they can't necessarily retest old samples, so customers who want more complete results in the future will likely have to buy and submit new kits.
As a 23andMe customer from a couple years ago, it never even occured to me to try re-running the results.