Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not misinterpreting your post. You diagnosed the author with Segawa's based on your experiences by pointing out you wouldn't be surprised if he "had something similar". He does not, with certainty. You're also warning folks that the only consistently successful treatments we have for this (much, much more common) hyperactivity disorder are associated with unlikely neurological outcomes. Sure, an 8x increase sound…
If you have any specific edits you want me to make, please post them and I will include them.
I'm here because I'm learning to write software, but I wouldn't pretend to understand the paper or mathematic theory behind, say, Paxos because I recognize some terms in it. I know my limitations, and all I ask is that you consider them, as well. The problem with raising awareness as you are is that it's difficult to objectively remove yourself: Segawa's is _incredibly_ rare, making all of the events in your family difficult to explain. Scientifically, transferring your experiences to others is a very tall order without much further study (and I hope you, and your family, are being studied, specifically because the genetics of Segawa's are poorly understood). What people portray as medical professionals swinging the hammer on "the information that could make us irrelevant" is actually trying to stand fast to the exact same scientific discipline that you, and every member of this audience, does in _every single other context_.
Your speculation about the relationship between ADHD and Segawa's is so far off base that a second-year medical student could probably explain why; you just happen to have been diagnosed with both. Left unspoken: it is quite possible to have both, because they present and manifest in different ways.