Never understood Kaggle. The Netflix Prize was great. Now it’s just people gaming Kaggle to get a job.
A Kaggle Grandmaster cheated in $25k AI contest with hidden code
11–20 of 197 posts
Re: A Kaggle Grandmaster cheated in $25k AI contest with hidden code
#12Re: A Kaggle Grandmaster cheated in $25k AI contest with hidden code
#13I remember reading about this on Twitter because of a reply from h2o.ai account. https://twitter.com/ppleskov/status/1215983188876709888?s=19 The person was originally employed at h2o.ai and as a consequence of this was fired. Not sure if that was completely appropriate. Wasn't this a personal participation? Or are there "company teams" on Kaggle ?
He has only been at h20 for a few months.
He was almost certainly hired at least in part because of his participation in the contest.
Re: A Kaggle Grandmaster cheated in $25k AI contest with hidden code
#14> " For me, it was never about the money but rather about the Kaggle points " Accumulated integer counts that represent social value and/or standing encourage destructive behavior.
It’s so fascinating to see how easily a human brain can be hijacked by status. I wonder if there’s a way to harness that power for improving individual performance...
Re: A Kaggle Grandmaster cheated in $25k AI contest with hidden code
#15> " For me, it was never about the money but rather about the Kaggle points " Accumulated integer counts that represent social value and/or standing encourage destructive behavior.
...he said, and then refreshed HN.
Perhaps someday we'll get a week without them.
Re: A Kaggle Grandmaster cheated in $25k AI contest with hidden code
#16I never understood Kaggle. Most competitions don't require code to be submitted, just predictions to be made on a test set with missing labels. So, you don't even need to apply machine learning and I'd bet money that lots of winners don't and label by hand or outsource. I don't understand the fascination and appeal of these so-called "grandmasters".
This is true of academic contests in general, btw, even without cheating. They stop being interesting/fun/good signals as soon as people start treating them as an independent skill set. Comparing performance on chess games for the first N games between two new players might be a good signal for some general intellectual capabilities. Comparing experienced players against one another is mostly just testing who's spent more time learning about chess.
Re: A Kaggle Grandmaster cheated in $25k AI contest with hidden code
#17Re: A Kaggle Grandmaster cheated in $25k AI contest with hidden code
#18I remember reading about this on Twitter because of a reply from h2o.ai account. https://twitter.com/ppleskov/status/1215983188876709888?s=19 The person was originally employed at h2o.ai and as a consequence of this was fired. Not sure if that was completely appropriate. Wasn't this a personal participation? Or are there "company teams" on Kaggle ?
Re: A Kaggle Grandmaster cheated in $25k AI contest with hidden code
#19Re: A Kaggle Grandmaster cheated in $25k AI contest with hidden code
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s so fascinating to see how easily a human brain can be hijacked by status. I wonder if there’s a way to harness that power for improving individual performance...
Napoleon Bonaparte: “Give me enough medals and I'll win you any war”