Live data from Hacker News

DuckDuckGo Traffic

duckduckgo.com

171–180 of 251 posts

Re: DuckDuckGo Traffic

#171
post #77

Any chance that DDG will not turn into Google if/when they grow too much?

For now they haven't made that turn.

If/when they do I'll happily drop them and start promoting another one.

But for now that is only hypothetical. The problems with Google exist right now.

Re: DuckDuckGo Traffic

#172
post #156

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Bing and Yandex are worth trying too. I just had a total failure from a Google search yesterday, where the official site for a piece of software wasn’t on the first 3 pages. I went over to bing and it was #1. I’m getting to the point where I predict a search will fail on google and I go to another engine. This never happened before, even in the Demand Media content farm debacle where horse shit ehow ranking for milli…

Isn't ddg Bing results?

DDG has their own crawler, but they augment results using Yandex and perhaps Bing too.

Re: DuckDuckGo Traffic

#173
post #156

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Bing and Yandex are worth trying too. I just had a total failure from a Google search yesterday, where the official site for a piece of software wasn’t on the first 3 pages. I went over to bing and it was #1. I’m getting to the point where I predict a search will fail on google and I go to another engine. This never happened before, even in the Demand Media content farm debacle where horse shit ehow ranking for milli…

Isn't ddg Bing results?

Quite sure Qwant does, but DDG does appear to have their own unique results.

For your convenience:

https://www.google.com/search?q=keris

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=keris

https://www.bing.com/search?q=keris

https://www.qwant.com/?q=keris

https://yandex.com/search/?text=keris

Re: DuckDuckGo Traffic

#174
post #155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> and now there's a neat new upstart to come along DuckDuckGo is 12 years old. They're far away from being a new upstart. To put that into perspective, AltaVista's prime years only lasted six or seven years (~1996-2002; sold off in 2003). DDG is now one of the oldest independent search engines in Internet history. Their very long-term, very slow, grinding upwards is one of the most amazing aspects of what they're acc…

Microsoft could decide to terminate their access to Bing APIs at any time resulting in DDG’s immediately losing most of their users. DDG does not have their own crawler or index.

DuckDuckGo do have their own crawler (DuckDuckBot), and they augment their results with other search providers other than Bing, including Yandex.

Re: DuckDuckGo Traffic

#175
post #3

Over the past 5 years I’ve tried DDG several times. Each time except the last I wanted to stick with it but the results simply didn’t stand up to what I’d see on Google. About 6 months ago (a year? I can’t remember) I switched and haven’t looked back. Now, when I look at google, the results actually look less relevant. As well, the ads on Google have become very obnoxious. I don’t feel like I’m being served the best…

Agree 100%. I recently switched all my devices to DDG as default search because the quality of Google search results has declined significantly. The same 5 sites are at the top of every search in a given problem domain. It's turning the Internet into a monoculture.

Re: DuckDuckGo Traffic

#176
post #14

Bang commands[0] really sealed DDG for me. I know Firefox had install-your-own search plugins forever, but the total lack of friction of typing “!yt badgerbadgerbadger” to get specifically YouTube results was fantastic. !g (search on Google) also makes it far easier to switch. Don’t like the results? Prefix !g and try again. My other favorites: !sr [name of subreddit] - much faster than “reddit.com/r/[name]” !r - Red…

chrome let's you type the first few characters of a page, and then press tab to enter a search term for that page.. e.g. y tab will let you search youtube, which is even a little faster than the DDG bangs for some sites.., but certainly acccompanied by unwanted privacy defaults.. not sure how much of it you can turn off and still use the feature..

This. I'll never understand the hype about bangs when you can do the same by typing a letter and tab your browser. en. to search on English Wikipedia, etc. Having to do ! seems awkward, plus you have to remember the letters.

Re: DuckDuckGo Traffic

#177
post #3

Over the past 5 years I’ve tried DDG several times. Each time except the last I wanted to stick with it but the results simply didn’t stand up to what I’d see on Google. About 6 months ago (a year? I can’t remember) I switched and haven’t looked back. Now, when I look at google, the results actually look less relevant. As well, the ads on Google have become very obnoxious. I don’t feel like I’m being served the best…

I have the exact same experience. Howerver on some edge cases still Google provides better results probably because of deep learning or similar.

Re: DuckDuckGo Traffic

#178

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Isn't ddg Bing results?

DDG has their own crawler, but they augment results using Yandex and perhaps Bing too.

I remember reading that it uses only Bing for web results and their crawler for Wikipedia only.

Re: DuckDuckGo Traffic

#179
post #81
post #3

Over the past 5 years I’ve tried DDG several times. Each time except the last I wanted to stick with it but the results simply didn’t stand up to what I’d see on Google. About 6 months ago (a year? I can’t remember) I switched and haven’t looked back. Now, when I look at google, the results actually look less relevant. As well, the ads on Google have become very obnoxious. I don’t feel like I’m being served the best…

Google's results have definitely become more quirky. Just now I was writing some SQLite database code and was wondering how the sum() aggregate handles integer overflow. So I searched for "sqlite integer overflow" in DDG and Google. To my surprise the first result in Google is someone's random blog post[0] from 2011 describing their experience which doesn't answer my question at all. I am very surprised Google decide…

This is a particularly interesting query, as both SO and the query itself share the word overflow, which probably is throwing off DDG from the result you were looking for.

For me, on DDG, it's the first result on the 2nd page, on Google, it's the third result.

It would appear that DDG and Google's results differentiate in a way, that the sequence of words probably don't matter on DDG, but do matter on Google.

Re: DuckDuckGo Traffic

#180
post #155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> and now there's a neat new upstart to come along DuckDuckGo is 12 years old. They're far away from being a new upstart. To put that into perspective, AltaVista's prime years only lasted six or seven years (~1996-2002; sold off in 2003). DDG is now one of the oldest independent search engines in Internet history. Their very long-term, very slow, grinding upwards is one of the most amazing aspects of what they're acc…

Microsoft could decide to terminate their access to Bing APIs at any time resulting in DDG’s immediately losing most of their users. DDG does not have their own crawler or index.

I don't know why they would, though. They get paid and it doesn't steal traffic from them. Unless Bing releases its own anonymous mode and DDG becomes a competitor. Then they could charge more or force DDG to display "powered by Bing" in the logo. That would be the end of DDG.
Post reply on HN