http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405274870477560457612...
Apple sets deadline for Amazon's Kindle app to change - They want 30% per book
11–20 of 107 posts
Re: Apple sets deadline for Amazon's Kindle app to change - They want 30% per book
#12But also clearly not in my interest as a putative Apple customer. (Alas, I fear I am not in Apple's target market.)
Re: Apple sets deadline for Amazon's Kindle app to change - They want 30% per book
#13How will this work for O'Reilly books I purchase in pdf format? How can Apple stop me from reading it without blocking all non-DRMed pdfs?
They likely won't. There are also plenty of PDF readers in the store already (Goodreader, for example) that are independent of Apple's iBooks. Unlike Sony, Apple isn't generally known for removing functionality from products after purchase...
Re: Apple sets deadline for Amazon's Kindle app to change - They want 30% per book
#14http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405274870477560457612...
As far as we know, Apple has not directly set a deadline for Amazon. In fact, there's no knew information other than the date: meaning there's still a lot of questions about the subscription rates and the actual requirements Apple will have in place.
Personally, I can't see how a 30% fee for what amounts to little more than payment processing can stand. It's one thing to charge the fee for app distribution and marketing in the store. It's another to handle on billing at which even 10% would seem rather high.
I don't see this lasting. Either publishers will charge an extra fee on iPad users and/or Apple will be taken to court for anti-trust, probably in Europe first.
Re: Apple sets deadline for Amazon's Kindle app to change - They want 30% per book
#15Re: Apple sets deadline for Amazon's Kindle app to change - They want 30% per book
#16Thus why you should only buy ebooks where you get easily transferrable formats, like unencumbered PDF or ePub. I'm a big fan of O'Reilly's multi-format approach. This is the correct end-run around proprietary stores. Regarding this issue in particular, I don't see the problem with Amazon and others kicking their users out to Safari to do purchases, and thus as the purchase wouldn't happen "in app" it wouldn't be cove…
" I don't see the problem with Amazon and others kicking their users out to Safari to do purchases" At least as far as I can tell from this article and others, this is one of the things that Apple wants to disallow. At least there must also be an option to buy using the Apple system, giving Apple a 30% cut. And I highly doubt that Apple's going to allow an app that says "click here to buy through Apple, click here to…
At most, maybe a "Visit Amazon Website" button that goes to the home page, then after Apple approves the app have their site detect iPad users linked from the app, jump them directly to the Kindle bookstore. That's the best end-run I could come up with.
Re: Apple sets deadline for Amazon's Kindle app to change - They want 30% per book
#17Re: Apple sets deadline for Amazon's Kindle app to change - They want 30% per book
#18This is clearly legal, as Apple don't have a monopoly. But also clearly not in my interest as a putative Apple customer. (Alas, I fear I am not in Apple's target market.)
Re: Apple sets deadline for Amazon's Kindle app to change - They want 30% per book
#19 * Leave the app as-is. (With what specific motive?)
* Jack up the prices. (Perhaps they'll include a notification when the user is on the relevant purchase page.)
* Leave the prices as-is and take the 30% hit.
* Let Apple kill the app.Re: Apple sets deadline for Amazon's Kindle app to change - They want 30% per book
#20Pretty greedy isn't it?