It costs $10k to ‘own’ a Chick-fil-A franchise
thehustle.co
It costs $10k to ‘own’ a Chick-fil-A franchise
1–10 of 233 posts
Re: It costs $10k to ‘own’ a Chick-fil-A franchise
#2Re: It costs $10k to ‘own’ a Chick-fil-A franchise
#3I always found franchise initial startup costs to be predatory, as they get paid either way regardless of whether the franchisee actually succeeds. In my opinion they should be abolished and franchisors should only rely on royalties, so that they have an incentive to help the franchisee succeed if they want to make money.
Re: It costs $10k to ‘own’ a Chick-fil-A franchise
#4I always found franchise initial startup costs to be predatory, as they get paid either way regardless of whether the franchisee actually succeeds. In my opinion they should be abolished and franchisors should only rely on royalties, so that they have an incentive to help the franchisee succeed if they want to make money.
Regardless, corporate is always incentivized to help their franchisees succeed; they wouldn't really have a business without them, and of course they want their cut of sales/profits to be a higher absolute value.
Re: It costs $10k to ‘own’ a Chick-fil-A franchise
#5I always found franchise initial startup costs to be predatory, as they get paid either way regardless of whether the franchisee actually succeeds. In my opinion they should be abolished and franchisors should only rely on royalties, so that they have an incentive to help the franchisee succeed if they want to make money.
Who should abolish them?
Re: It costs $10k to ‘own’ a Chick-fil-A franchise
#6I always found franchise initial startup costs to be predatory, as they get paid either way regardless of whether the franchisee actually succeeds. In my opinion they should be abolished and franchisors should only rely on royalties, so that they have an incentive to help the franchisee succeed if they want to make money.
Re: It costs $10k to ‘own’ a Chick-fil-A franchise
#7I always found franchise initial startup costs to be predatory, as they get paid either way regardless of whether the franchisee actually succeeds. In my opinion they should be abolished and franchisors should only rely on royalties, so that they have an incentive to help the franchisee succeed if they want to make money.
Re: It costs $10k to ‘own’ a Chick-fil-A franchise
#8I always found franchise initial startup costs to be predatory, as they get paid either way regardless of whether the franchisee actually succeeds. In my opinion they should be abolished and franchisors should only rely on royalties, so that they have an incentive to help the franchisee succeed if they want to make money.
What incentivizes the new location to do due-diligence in picking a good location? If this is placed into the chain owner: What's the difference between a franchise vs single owner?
Re: It costs $10k to ‘own’ a Chick-fil-A franchise
#9I think I'd rather just get a job at Google.