Earlier quoted context omitted.
"Requires Android 5.0 and up" according to the Play Store listing. Android 4.x is from 2013 and had its last update in 2014. It hasn't received security patches since October 2017. Why should Mozilla continue to support such an ancient version?
> It hasn't received security patches since October 2017. Why should Mozilla continue to support such an ancient version? Because ALL of their big competitors namely Chrome, Brave, Opera, and now Edge, support the "ancient" Android 4.x version.
A new browsing experience arrives in Firefox for Android Nightly
101–110 of 152 posts
Re: A new browsing experience arrives in Firefox for Android Nightly
#102Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't understand why you've brought up what the current state of affairs is, the article says: > For current Nightly users, it’ll feel like a big exciting upgrade of their browsing experience once they update the app Which sounds to me like Fennec is going away and the update will replace it with Fenix. >as of right now both Nightly and Preview Nightly exist side by side; regular nightly users are not impacted at t…
> What will happen when the "new experience" the article talks about is launched? Can't people use the stable version then? I fail to see the issue here.
So that means for at least most of 2020, I won't have the option for the browser experience I like and will have to go use brave mobile or something.
As someone who wants to avoid a Chromium hegemony, this is pretty disappointing. I would like to support Mozilla on mobile, but they'll leave me no options to do so.
Re: A new browsing experience arrives in Firefox for Android Nightly
#103Lots of comments in this thread about why they have implemented this before implementing addons. Based on Mozilla's public project board it looks like they are well underway on implementing add-ons: https://github.com/orgs/mozilla-mobile/projects/44 Check the done column
And as many comments here indicate (and I am with those who feel this way), for a huge swath of FF for Android users, the ability to have uBlockOrigin is the critical reason why they have FF for Android installed in the first place.
As in, if there is no uBlockOrigin, there is no remaining compelling reason to run FF for Android. This is a failure of the mozilla marketing droids to understand their customers.
Re: A new browsing experience arrives in Firefox for Android Nightly
#104Earlier quoted context omitted.
> It hasn't received security patches since October 2017. Why should Mozilla continue to support such an ancient version? Because ALL of their big competitors namely Chrome, Brave, Opera, and now Edge, support the "ancient" Android 4.x version.
Brave stopped supporting Android 4.x as well, see https://community.brave.com/t/installing-brave-on-android-wi... . The last version that supported 4.4 was 1.3.2, they're at 1.6.3 now for Android 5.0+.
I have Brave v1.6.2 installed on my 4.4.2 phone
Edit: just now i've upgraded to the latest v1.6.3, as you can see brave's still receives updates on a android 4.x
Re: A new browsing experience arrives in Firefox for Android Nightly
#1051) addons don't work yet
2) sharing of media files doesn't work https://github.com/mozilla-mobile/fenix/issues/3621
3) you can't add exceptions for ssl certificates https://github.com/mozilla-mobile/fenix/issues/1168
And it's all in all more buggy then firefox for me....
I really welcome a new approach, but since in my extensive testing it performed as bad as firefox and had more crashes it will more or less force me either to stick to an older firefox release (mask updates) or use a different browser (maybe install gecko as html framework and use lightning or something)
Edit: formatting and added conclusion
Re: A new browsing experience arrives in Firefox for Android Nightly
#106Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not you, I only opened the article to see if they had dealt with input lag and just lag in general and I get 6 paragraphs of unwanted marketing speak until I even get close to something resembling actual changes. If anyone from Mozilla is reading this, just get to the facts next time, don't insult us by throwing a ton of marketing babble at us, we don't care.
That marketing babble is there for the same reason the majority of YouTube videos are >10 minutes and filled with the same filler: Google's ranking algorithm. For YouTube videos it's mean watch time. Filler babble pumps up those numbers. For Google, it's mean read time. Filler babble also pumps up this number. However, it also ranks higher directly because it's considered a "long form" piece instead of a soundbite, a…
> Mozilla, and every other website owner, must play the game
No. Mozilla and every other contributor still have a responsibility for what they put out there. Google and Facebook messing up the overall environment doesn't let individual contributors off the hook.
Re: A new browsing experience arrives in Firefox for Android Nightly
#107If Firefox pushes this before implementing support for extensions (namely uBlock or other ad-blocking / privacy extensions) then Firefox is well and truly toast on Android. Correct me if I am wrong but the only reason non-tech people use Firefox on Android is to block ads. Perhaps this is a push from Mozilla to try and get some search revenue flowing again?
Re: A new browsing experience arrives in Firefox for Android Nightly
#108I use Firefox over Chrome because Google - you know... there's a submission a day about that - and I trust Mozilla much more to be-not-evil and such. So it's kind of a political-ethical thing. On PC performance is on par so it's not a compromising choice. On Android Chrome still has an edge.
Re: A new browsing experience arrives in Firefox for Android Nightly
#109Earlier quoted context omitted.
That marketing babble is there for the same reason the majority of YouTube videos are >10 minutes and filled with the same filler: Google's ranking algorithm. For YouTube videos it's mean watch time. Filler babble pumps up those numbers. For Google, it's mean read time. Filler babble also pumps up this number. However, it also ranks higher directly because it's considered a "long form" piece instead of a soundbite, a…
> Blame Google, for its algorithms that are directly shaping our communications and culture. Hell, blame all tech companies that use algorithms to determine culture > Mozilla, and every other website owner, must play the game No. Mozilla and every other contributor still have a responsibility for what they put out there. Google and Facebook messing up the overall environment doesn't let individual contributors off th…
We all have to do things in our own self-interest, especially when there are higher powers bearing down upon us.
They're not off the hook, but they're not the biggest fish that needs to be fried. Going after them won't solve anything except the need to vent one's own emotions.
The cycle will continue to repeat for other websites and other people. We've established that it happens often, and we've even established the root cause. Idling on "who's at fault and what should their punishment be" is just that: idling.
Re: A new browsing experience arrives in Firefox for Android Nightly
#110If the nightly beta is like firefox preview then it's too early for it. 1) addons don't work yet 2) sharing of media files doesn't work https://github.com/mozilla-mobile/fenix/issues/3621 3) you can't add exceptions for ssl certificates https://github.com/mozilla-mobile/fenix/issues/1168 And it's all in all more buggy then firefox for me.... I really welcome a new approach, but since in my extensive testing it perfor…
I've used it as main browser for a while and have the same impression. For instance it simply crashes when logging in to certain websites, even after a clean install. Probably some bug with cookies.
Edit: it also still uses more battery than Chrome for me. Apart of that it's a top browser.