Earlier quoted context omitted.
That cannot be true. It does not contain the message '4'. (Or any of the non-primes.) In fact it seems like there must be many more non-primes than primes over any finite interval (for the simple reason that multiplication gets a lot of whacks at the piñata, e.g. producing a product landing in that finite interval.) So to answer your implied question ("why bother commucating with primes anwyay?") I guess the value of…
> That cannot be true. It does not contain the message '4'. (Or any of the non-primes.) Any finite message (containing a finite number of symbols drawn from a finite alphabet) can be represented as a positive integer. Any positive integer n can be encoded in a prime, even a composite integer. Use the following encoding system: write 1 n times, followed by a zero, followed by an arbitrary bit string. For example, for…
The only reason to limit ourselves to primes is because its trivial to produce a meaningful composite, and very difficult to produce a meaningful prime. Take this message; if I was to associate it with a number (say by joining its characters as 7-bit ASCII), my money is that it's composite. (Not sure what the odds are, but I'd take 100:1 odds).
EDIT: period is `01110`, which is even, so I win.