IBM's "Watson" finally ready for prime-time Jeopardy
31–40 of 148 posts
Re: IBM's "Watson" finally ready for prime-time Jeopardy
#32Affordable tablets, intelligent computers, commercial space travel... it's so great to live in the future. Now, won't somebody please design a viable successor to the Concorde?
Re: IBM's "Watson" finally ready for prime-time Jeopardy
#33Re: IBM's "Watson" finally ready for prime-time Jeopardy
#34Re: IBM's "Watson" finally ready for prime-time Jeopardy
#35http://www-943.ibm.com/innovation/us/watson/
Re: IBM's "Watson" finally ready for prime-time Jeopardy
#36How much of the Watson code is Java?
Re: IBM's "Watson" finally ready for prime-time Jeopardy
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
Watson is not a simulation any more than your brain is a simulation. Your brain is ( likely ) mostly just algorithms and data structures, albeit on an enormous scale. This could be wrong, but I'm betting not. What else could the brain possibly be? It's not magic. > We will know when Watson is dangerous when it feels fear, angst, want. Not just an algorithm to sort facts and simulate speech. Nah. Look at good science…
I deny that the human brain IS algorithms. It is neurons connected by dendrons/synapses. Right? Small bits of it can be algorithmically simulated. Large processes can be algorithmically simulated. But to call the algorithm "intelligence" is sympathetic magic. Algorithms work in a different way; they break in a different way; they are hard-coded so don't change. They are a simulation.
"I deny that Watson IS algorithms. It is transistors assembled into logic gates. Right?"
My statement is obviously a silly thing to say. Watson is both algorithms and transistors, depending on how you care to think about it. If you believe that your statement is not equally silly, please explain.
Re: IBM's "Watson" finally ready for prime-time Jeopardy
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
I deny that the human brain IS algorithms. It is neurons connected by dendrons/synapses. Right? Small bits of it can be algorithmically simulated. Large processes can be algorithmically simulated. But to call the algorithm "intelligence" is sympathetic magic. Algorithms work in a different way; they break in a different way; they are hard-coded so don't change. They are a simulation.
No disrespect intended but, I think you are lacking a fundamental understanding of machine learning, genetic algorithms, neural networks and AI in general. I was introduced to Watson when I took a sub-project from IBM related to Watson, I had no idea what it was untill taking the contract, at which point I was introduced to Watson and it is an impressive feat, it is with out a doubt the state of the art in NLP AI. Su…
One of my favourite thought experiments in the area being Searle's Chinese Room:
Re: IBM's "Watson" finally ready for prime-time Jeopardy
#39This is going to be, for lack of better words, epic. On a personal level however, it's a reminder of how truly wondrous the future is. When Deep Blue beat Kasparov I was a kid in an Italian high school, trying to explain to disinterested fellow students why that was a big deal. Not even in my wildest dreams I would have imagined to be working for the company that made that and this event possible, in a different coun…
Re: IBM's "Watson" finally ready for prime-time Jeopardy
#40http://www-943.ibm.com/innovation/us/watson/