Live data from Hacker News

The Unstoppable Rise of Sci-Hub (2019)

blogs.lse.ac.uk

221–230 of 247 posts

Re: The Unstoppable Rise of Sci-Hub (2019)

#221
post #216
post #151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm under the impression that massive investment in DRM is more of a way to satisfy tech and (pirate) culture-illiterate humans while making deals for content. Even Steam needed to nominally do something and Gaben's position on piracy/drm is very well-known.

Why should such humans be satisfied?

Because they pay the bills.

Re: The Unstoppable Rise of Sci-Hub (2019)

#222
post #188

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ok you might want to watch this short documentary. Your fun 'pirated' games and software with 'better support' might cost you dearly when your daughter or your girlfriend/wife gets filmed by a hacker, using your own webcam. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFS3p0emftw - "Security awareness: Filmmaker explores RAT malware, buys access to random PCs for just 15 cents a piece - made short film about his experience" Movie…

"This video contains content from VPRO BROADCAST, who has blocked it in your country on copyright grounds." The video is unpirated in The Netherlands (VPRO is Dutch too).

You can watch the Dutch version on the VPRO's YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGsw_l0tT10

Re: The Unstoppable Rise of Sci-Hub (2019)

#223
post #217

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Dangerous for Windows maybe? Most cracked OS X apps make you disable Gatekeeper or System Integry Protection. Game over. So yes, to me that is an invititation.

Any examples of something that requires disabling SIP in cracked version and not original? Never heard of it, sounds implausible but then I'm hardly up to speed. Like I get swapping dylibs, but not why that'd be best done by poking around in /System rather than the binary.

Had a cracked copy of binding of isaac reborn that reuired disabling SIP once, dunno if that was a thing for the legal copy though

Re: The Unstoppable Rise of Sci-Hub (2019)

#224
post #217

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Dangerous for Windows maybe? Most cracked OS X apps make you disable Gatekeeper or System Integry Protection. Game over. So yes, to me that is an invititation.

Any examples of something that requires disabling SIP in cracked version and not original? Never heard of it, sounds implausible but then I'm hardly up to speed. Like I get swapping dylibs, but not why that'd be best done by poking around in /System rather than the binary.

Both 'appked' and 'macbed' websites have guides for disabling both Gatekeepr and SIP (now they are derivative websites because the domains keep getting banned/confiscated):

macappdownload dot com slash fix-damaged-app-message

macappdownload dot com slash how-to-disable-system-integrity-protection-in-macos

These guides are all over their websites, especially at the download stage, where there is a short list of 'download instructions' with a link to these guides.

A while back I read someone saying that these websites are owned by a Russian hacker network. Touch at your own risk.

Re: The Unstoppable Rise of Sci-Hub (2019)

#225
post #12

Why does everyone talk about sci-hub and no one about library genesis? The latter is a way more comprehensive repository.

It's kind of complementary. I use sci-hub for everything with a DOI, and for books I use genesis.

Check out /scimag on your favorite libgen mirror.

Re: The Unstoppable Rise of Sci-Hub (2019)

#226
post #7

Sci-hub has been critical to me as I developed the idea for my current startup. If it didn't exist, I could have gotten most of the papers from friends in academia, but it would have been dramatically harder and slower. I use it, I support the concept. I'll make a slight counterpoint however. It costs between $1-$5k (very rough numbers) to publish in open access journals usually. That's not nothing, but it defrays th…

Editor and former professor here.

Pay to publish imho always seemed to have a perverse incentive structure to me. Reminds me of the "advertisement" journals you used to see.

The way I see this headed is academic nonprofit orgs self publishing using open source software etc. and recouping costs through membership fees. Journals are already often closely affiliated with orgs, and the members do all the work except copyediting and editorial portals. Academics are also used to paying academic org membership fees for other reasons.

I've already had conversations in this direction with colleagues.

It's either this or eventually things like the preprint services, maybe with sugar on top.

The killer app in this area would be an open source service / server software for running a journal imho. If it were done well it would be hard to beat.

That said, I think traditional publication models are going to be around for awhile, maybe with much more open access or lower pub charges, just because the publishers do provide a service, even if access and price are distorted, and there isn't a uniformly better model at the moment (maybe too big a conversation for typing on my phone).

Re: The Unstoppable Rise of Sci-Hub (2019)

#227

> Sci-Hub ... an out and out copyright pirate Arrr! Shiver me timbers. > papers harvested (illegally) illegaly? Maybe, in some world states; but not in others. Also, the illegality is temporary. Think of Marijuana in the US (and many other places). A significant fraction of the population uses it. It took them a good number of decades, but they're gradually legalizing it. With scientific publications - Sci-Hub and Li…

I couldn't find any reference to it being blocked except in that article.

A test seems to show it's not blocked though:

https://viewdns.info/chinesefirewall/?domain=sci-hub.tw

Closest mention outside of original article is this The Verge article (2018), saying that they blocked China and Iran for a while because of too many requests from users; but this is sci-hub blocking not China banning

https://www.theverge.com/2018/2/8/16985666/alexandra-elbakya...

Re: The Unstoppable Rise of Sci-Hub (2019)

#229
post #217

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Any examples of something that requires disabling SIP in cracked version and not original? Never heard of it, sounds implausible but then I'm hardly up to speed. Like I get swapping dylibs, but not why that'd be best done by poking around in /System rather than the binary.

Both 'appked' and 'macbed' websites have guides for disabling both Gatekeepr and SIP (now they are derivative websites because the domains keep getting banned/confiscated): macappdownload dot com slash fix-damaged-app-message macappdownload dot com slash how-to-disable-system-integrity-protection-in-macos These guides are all over their websites, especially at the download stage, where there is a short list of 'downl…

My question was "Any examples of something that requires disabling SIP in cracked version and not original?", this (while certainly possibly relevant) is not an answer to that.

Re: The Unstoppable Rise of Sci-Hub (2019)

#230
post #168

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just for your reference: compliments Complement means when two things go well together.

OP used “complement” correctly - as in, ease of use complements (goes well with) scihub being free.

OP was replying to someone who said they disagreed with the article, and argued that scihub was easy to use. OP said the article praised scihub’s ease of use, meaning complimented it.
Post reply on HN