https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purkinje_effect
edit: maybe not. Looks like one is physiological, the other physical
81–90 of 171 posts
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purkinje_effect
edit: maybe not. Looks like one is physiological, the other physical
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Except light is a wave and not a particle so reflection is explained when you consider that.
Light is not a wave. Photons are particles. Light as a wave is a convenient abstraction that explains a lot of light's behaviors, but not all of them. I recommend Feynman's QED lectures (or the book), where he explains this.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave%E2%80%93particle_duality#...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not convinced but even if we accept that explanation, why do all the atoms along the way emit the light in the direction it was travelling and then the ones at the surface suddenly emit it in a different direction?
I can recommend Hecht’s Optics textbook for this. I found it at my local library. I have had a number of electromagnetics courses over my life and none explained the unifying scattering principles of reflection, transmission, and refraction concept so clearly as that book
This is a bit hand-wavey in its' description of light reflecting. One of the most mind blowing bits of physics I've ever learned is that photons do not actually "bounce" off of a surface like little balls. They are always absorbed and re-emitted. The actual photons that hit an object are not the same ones that eventually enter your eyes. The atoms in an object are stimulated by photons hitting them to then emit a new…
It's less hand-wavey. Also, the reflectivity of water is very low at low angles of incidence, rising to 100% at normal angles. Less light reaches the wetted material. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Water_reflectivity.jpg
https://www.quora.com/Why-does-snow-appear-white-in-colour-w...
https://www.quora.com/Why-do-damp-items-such-as-fabrics-appe...
This is a bit hand-wavey in its' description of light reflecting. One of the most mind blowing bits of physics I've ever learned is that photons do not actually "bounce" off of a surface like little balls. They are always absorbed and re-emitted. The actual photons that hit an object are not the same ones that eventually enter your eyes. The atoms in an object are stimulated by photons hitting them to then emit a new…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, the water drops on the surface of the skin act as mini lens.
I am unconvinced by this argument. After all, the same light flux is hitting your body. Only thing a lens would do is make it focus in different spots than it otherwise would, but then you'd get spots with burns and spots without burns. This is not what I see happening at all.
It’s possibly still noticeable via the naked eye, but you’d have to compare and contrast to notice the slight mottling.
Related Q/A on physics.SE: https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/30366/why-do-wet...
If you find this kind of thing interesting, I strongly recommend the book [The Nature of Light and Colour in the Open Air]( https://store.doverpublications.com/0486201961.html ) by Marcel Minnaert. He discusses why wet things are darker, why shadows of leaves have little circular gaps, how to see the "green flash" that sometimes precedes a sunset, and dozens of others, some you might have noticed and wondered about,…