Live data from Hacker News

Earth-sized exoplanet ‘habitable zone’

nature.com

31–40 of 95 posts

Re: Earth-sized exoplanet ‘habitable zone’

#31
post #5
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I imagine that there is a small area where life would be possible?

These types of planets are known as 'Eyeball planets'. [1] They are hypothesized to have a hot side and a cold side, and potentially a ring around the periphery that is 'just right' where liquid water could form and sustain life. Not sure if this particular planet would meet those criteria. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eyeball_planet

The problem is that around the margins where it's "just right", you'll probably have mega-winds and stuff, too.

Re: Earth-sized exoplanet ‘habitable zone’

#33
post #15
post #4

> Astronomers have discovered a world only a little bit bigger than Earth, whirling around a bright star about 31 parsecs from our planet. Parsec is one of those units that is difficult to remember if you just look at the conversion (1 parsec = 3.26 light years). If you remember how it's defined, however, it somehow becomes easier (for me anyway). One parsec is the distance at which one astronomical unit (AU, mean di…

I just remember that a parsec is the same as a light year. By astronomical standards of precision, that's about right.

Is that the same as discarding constants in big O notation?

Re: Earth-sized exoplanet ‘habitable zone’

#35
post #3

According to this [1] it's probably tidally locked, which means that despite being in the goldilocks zone, the environment is likely problematic for life. [1] https://www.sciencealert.com/nasa-found-a-tatooine-like-plan...

I imagine that there is a small area where life would be possible?

The snow storms are pretty bad I imagine.

Re: Earth-sized exoplanet ‘habitable zone’

#36

I've been pondering this for a while: once we have artificial gravity in space (from rotation, for instance), would we ever want to shackle ourselves to the gravity of a foreign planet? It would be so much easier just to create the ideal environment in a large, rotating cylinder instead of having adjust a planet's environment to our needs. Take this new discovery for instance. Imagine that this planet is 400m years y…

> It would be so much easier just to create the ideal environment in a large, rotating cylinder instead of having adjust a planet's environment to our needs.

Yea but people want to go outside.

Re: Earth-sized exoplanet ‘habitable zone’

#37
post #15
post #4

> Astronomers have discovered a world only a little bit bigger than Earth, whirling around a bright star about 31 parsecs from our planet. Parsec is one of those units that is difficult to remember if you just look at the conversion (1 parsec = 3.26 light years). If you remember how it's defined, however, it somehow becomes easier (for me anyway). One parsec is the distance at which one astronomical unit (AU, mean di…

I just remember that a parsec is the same as a light year. By astronomical standards of precision, that's about right.

[deleted]

Re: Earth-sized exoplanet ‘habitable zone’

#38

I've been pondering this for a while: once we have artificial gravity in space (from rotation, for instance), would we ever want to shackle ourselves to the gravity of a foreign planet? It would be so much easier just to create the ideal environment in a large, rotating cylinder instead of having adjust a planet's environment to our needs. Take this new discovery for instance. Imagine that this planet is 400m years y…

> It would be so much easier just to create the ideal environment in a large, rotating cylinder instead of having adjust a planet's environment to our needs. Yea but people want to go outside.

Artificial outside? If the ship, for lack of a better term, were big enough its conceivable that you could have a larger open area with grass and trees which would feel much like a park.

Could even paint the roof blue.

Re: Earth-sized exoplanet ‘habitable zone’

#40
post #15
post #4

> Astronomers have discovered a world only a little bit bigger than Earth, whirling around a bright star about 31 parsecs from our planet. Parsec is one of those units that is difficult to remember if you just look at the conversion (1 parsec = 3.26 light years). If you remember how it's defined, however, it somehow becomes easier (for me anyway). One parsec is the distance at which one astronomical unit (AU, mean di…

I just remember that a parsec is the same as a light year. By astronomical standards of precision, that's about right.

[deleted]
Post reply on HN