Germany is moving beyond nuclear power, but at what cost?
1–10 of 239 posts
Re: Germany is moving beyond nuclear power, but at what cost?
#2Re: Germany is moving beyond nuclear power, but at what cost?
#3Re: Germany is moving beyond nuclear power, but at what cost?
#4Sadly, the anti-nuclear movement in Germany is very strong. Germany also has a declining Coal industry. So after Fukushima shrewd politicians moved to shutter nuclear plants and return to coal. The worst part? German coal is some of the worst in terms of sulfur and pollutants.
It's an absolutely atrocious energy source.
Re: Germany is moving beyond nuclear power, but at what cost?
#5Sadly, the anti-nuclear movement in Germany is very strong. Germany also has a declining Coal industry. So after Fukushima shrewd politicians moved to shutter nuclear plants and return to coal. The worst part? German coal is some of the worst in terms of sulfur and pollutants.
That's not true. The phasing out of nuclear energy was decided in the late 90s after the Social Democrats and Greens had taken over the government. This was part of a larger green energy package. This had been a major issue for the Greens since at least the 80s when the party was founded.
The Merkel government attempted to roll some of that back in 2010, but was blindsided by the Fukushima accident that caused public opinion to become much more polarised again w.r.t. nuclear energy.
Please stop spreading this misinformation that the end of nuclear energy in Germany was caused by Fukushima.
Re: Germany is moving beyond nuclear power, but at what cost?
#6Sadly, the anti-nuclear movement in Germany is very strong. Germany also has a declining Coal industry. So after Fukushima shrewd politicians moved to shutter nuclear plants and return to coal. The worst part? German coal is some of the worst in terms of sulfur and pollutants.
> So after Fukushima shrewd politicians moved to shutter nuclear plants and return to coal. That's not true. The phasing out of nuclear energy was decided in the late 90s after the Social Democrats and Greens had taken over the government. This was part of a larger green energy package. This had been a major issue for the Greens since at least the 80s when the party was founded. The Merkel government attempted to rol…
P.S. I misread the comment...
Re: Germany is moving beyond nuclear power, but at what cost?
#7A far cry for the massive french nuclear power program, which managed to achieve large cost benefits by deciding on a single reactor type and then deploying at a large scale, with only incremental updates in later generations.
In this light their decision to shutdown seems a little less insane, still could be bad to loose all the related knowledge and industry as a result, which might make deployment of new reactors in the future hard.
Re: Germany is moving beyond nuclear power, but at what cost?
#8And because the environmental goals had higher rank than economic and selfish ones, they did not enact trade barriers, or lobby for them on an EU Level, even when it became clear it would be Chinese manufacturers reaping the profits of mass production.
Re: Germany is moving beyond nuclear power, but at what cost?
#9Re: Germany is moving beyond nuclear power, but at what cost?
#10Solar kills more people than nuclear per watt, so that’s the reporter’s personal agenda talking
https://www.statista.com/statistics/494425/death-rate-worldw...