Amazing how Apple managed to make the first cool MP3 player, then the first cool smartphone and now the first cool bluetooth headset. For almost 20 years now, Apple has owned electronic fashion. Sony for example was unable to parlay its Walkman dominance into similar positions with new devices. And make no mistake about it - a huge portion of these sales are people buying Apple's marketing - not buying the tech itsel…
>now the first cool bluetooth headset [citation needed] Honstly every time I see someone wearing earpods I can't take him seriously anymore, they look _so_ bad. There's a lot of options on the market, and airpods are the ugliest of them all.
Apple AirPods: iPhone accessory or the next big thing?
101–110 of 696 posts
Re: Apple AirPods: iPhone accessory or the next big thing?
#102Earlier quoted context omitted.
>now the first cool bluetooth headset [citation needed] Honstly every time I see someone wearing earpods I can't take him seriously anymore, they look _so_ bad. There's a lot of options on the market, and airpods are the ugliest of them all.
When you talk to people, you're supposed to look at their eyes, not their ears.
Re: Apple AirPods: iPhone accessory or the next big thing?
#103Amazing how Apple managed to make the first cool MP3 player, then the first cool smartphone and now the first cool bluetooth headset. For almost 20 years now, Apple has owned electronic fashion. Sony for example was unable to parlay its Walkman dominance into similar positions with new devices. And make no mistake about it - a huge portion of these sales are people buying Apple's marketing - not buying the tech itsel…
Re: Apple AirPods: iPhone accessory or the next big thing?
#104Earlier quoted context omitted.
> stopped reading there. says much more about your limitations than about airpods... ever heard of hearing aids?
Yes, and people hate them, but there are no alternatives. Why would you want something permanently in your ear to measure heart rate?
Re: Apple AirPods: iPhone accessory or the next big thing?
#105I've idly thought that Spotify should get into hardware. Headphones and/or speaker, purchase it connected to your account, and one touch button to a stream of music you like. Obviously a million times easier said than done, but has to be a better margin business than where they currently are and would be good lock in.
A headphone that only works with Spotify? My Bose QC that I can use for anything (including Spotify - with a single on button to connect to bluetooth controlled via my phone or laptop) isn't really inconvenient or anything.
For example, to use the parent cliche, my sister got my father AirPods this Christmas despite me saying it is probably a bad idea. And it has gone unused because he doesn't grok Bluetooth even in the simplified AirPod way (also, his iPhone is too old to support it natively). But if I gave him a pair of headphones and said "press this button, it will play Van Morrison and Sly Stone", he would use it in a heartbeat.
Re: Apple AirPods: iPhone accessory or the next big thing?
#106Do Airpods have a built-in microphone, and audio/ambient mixing (with ratio controllable through the phone)? I can't believe this feature is not standard on today's headphone products, especially digital ones. edit : Thanks for the responses. Looks like Airpods pro do have this feature. Thumbs up!
Re: Apple AirPods: iPhone accessory or the next big thing?
#107Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or, you can pay to replace the battery. I've done it with an old iPhone6 and got back a pretty usable device.
battery replacements aren't a thing for AirPods. You can send them to Apple to be recycled, though.
To replace the batteries: $50 each airpod, $50 for the charging case
Re: Apple AirPods: iPhone accessory or the next big thing?
#108I've idly thought that Spotify should get into hardware. Headphones and/or speaker, purchase it connected to your account, and one touch button to a stream of music you like. Obviously a million times easier said than done, but has to be a better margin business than where they currently are and would be good lock in.
A “single purpose music box” would be neat to me. Maybe it controls all the speakers in my house, informs me of concerts coming up, let’s me set a mood, and most importantly doesn’t care about anything else. I feel like every gadget being in one is gonna start breaking down now that software interop is more of a thing.
The smartphone has a huge advantage: you only need to have 1 device in your pocket to do everything. Not having to go get something from another room may not seem like a big deal but I think it really is. (Or I am just lazy.)
Re: Apple AirPods: iPhone accessory or the next big thing?
#109A couple years ago, I got a bit of saltwater in my iPhone and the headphone jack failed. Since the next generation of iPhone (the iPhone X) was about to come out, I held onto it for a couple months and bought AirPods. I then realized this was Apple's real reason for eliminating the headphone jack. It had nothing to do with courage. It was about eliminating a deeply ingrained user habit so they could solve the problem…
I then realized this was Apple's real reason for eliminating the headphone jack. To do away with the point of failure that you so aptly illustrated by getting salt water in your phone? I wouldn't have bothered with the AirPods if my headphone jack had continued to function. That's you, though. There are clearly millions and millions of people who don't want wires.
Wires don't just work when they get tangled or broken.
Wireless doesn't just work when it runs out of batteries, gets glitches/interference, or is hassle to pair.
Apple was able to tip the 'just works' balance through good engineering.
Re: Apple AirPods: iPhone accessory or the next big thing?
#110As always, none of the numbers are official, so take all of them with a huge grain of salt. The article also doesn't link to a single source, not even an unofficial one. > Assuming an even split of sales between Gen 1, Gen 2, and AirPods Pro, Airpods revenue was $12 billion in 2019 This itself is a terrible assumption. AirPods Pro launched in November 2019, so had just 2 months of sales. Even otherwise, there is neve…
Also this is revenue numbers too. No mention of margins over expenses.
If we were to consider that, the comparison is guaranteed to be dramatically worse (in the favor of Apple).
Shopify, Snapchat and Spotify have yet to earn a single net dollar in profit. They're all still losing money as of their most recent quarters. And their lifetime losses are epic to say the least. Twitter also may still be negative for its lifetime, given its very substantial past losses.
If Apple has even modest 10% margins on the Airpods (it's more likely to be 2x to 3x that), it's at least a billion a year in profit right now. That's probably more than Spotify could earn on its zero margin business even if you gave them $20 billion in sales.