Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Although they claim to let customers deny police requests for footage, their terms of service allow them to hand video over to police if they deem the request "reasonable". Defining what is a "reasonable government request" is a valid question, but it's really just not that high of a bar to get a records subpoena/search warrant for video like this. Courts sign off on those routinely, so I don't think you can really…
> Is there something I'm missing here? Yes. If Ring had even the barest shred of ethics, they would client-side encrypt the videos stored in their cloud. It would use no extra space. The user would have to explicitly approve the decryption and sharing of videos. But they don't, because being able to access and datamine those videos is a huge money-maker for them. Ring is terrible, but their engineers willing to imple…
The average user can't be trusted to manage client-side encryption keys reliably.