Earlier quoted context omitted.
"Equivalent of a 1960s building being knocked down today." I feel like you refuted your first sentence with this!
A 1960s building is old, but 80 years isn't really enough to inspire awe; there are plenty of existing structures several hundred to several thousands of years old. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_oldest_known_survivi...
That's absolutely untrue. Plenty of buildings inspire awe immediately upon completion and plenty of them have gone through their entire life-cycle within a span of 60 years. Try Quarry Hill Flats for a start. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=quarry+hill+%2Bflats&t=opera&ia=im...
"there are plenty of existing structures several hundred to several thousands of years old."
This is a bizarrely obvious statement, like, who doesn't know this?