This article is 100% true. My first job out of college 10 years ago was in a lab focused on Alzheimer’s research. Our Principle Investigator made an art of writing grant applications for studies that would appear to be in line with mainstream theory, but were really intended to test theories he actually thought were worth testing, presented in results as an “interesting” aside. He believed the amyloid theory had been…
This has been my experience more-or-less as well. Any graduate student that does anything even alzheimer's adjacent at the school I used to work at absolutely had to have a certain two researchers on their dissertation committee and they would 100% not let you progress without throwing a bone to beta-amyloid in your proposal (along with heavily pushing you to pander to some of their personal pet theories). It's a sun…
* Type 1 diabetes: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2019.12.18.881433v1
* Multiple sclerosis: https://stm.sciencemag.org/content/10/462/eaat4301
* Lupus: https://stm.sciencemag.org/content/10/434/eaan2306
* Sjogren's: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S15216...
* Anti-phospholipid: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S19313...
* Parkinson's: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/mds.27105
* Alzheimer's: https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/5/1/eaau3333?intcmp=...
It's like the old joke that science progresses one funeral at a time.