I took a speed reading course one summer when I was in college. My mother thought that it would give me an edge. First they test you and my reading speed was already on the high end of normal. In the course I did theoretically more than double my reading speed. But my comprehension was based on the test they gave me. Plus I noticed that I tired quickly doing speed reading. I was a kid who loved to read and had no pro…
This article feels like a vindication of sorts, for my own speed reading experience. Years ago, I read a book on speed reading, and just as we think everything that is in a book must be written by an expert, starting adopting the techniques without second guessing it. Blamed myself for not being smart enough for loosing comprehension when these techniques have obviously worked for everyone else. Reading this is somew…
I Was Wrong About Speed Reading (2015)
161–170 of 170 posts
Re: I Was Wrong About Speed Reading (2015)
#162Earlier quoted context omitted.
One of the best courses I ever took was a 2 week summer school class in typing in the 8th grade. We were taught to touch type on a heavy mechanical typewriter where you really had to hammer the keys. Those few hours have paid off enormously for me. Not having to look at the keys while typing about doubles the speed. The letters painted on my keys have long since worn off anyway :-)
> One of the best courses I ever took was a 2 week summer school class in typing in the 8th grade. We were taught to touch type on a heavy mechanical typewriter where you really had to hammer the keys. In my school, we had a full semester of touch-typing on mechanical keyboard in both the 7th and 8th grades. Everyone had to take it. I had a couple of friends who, like me, were very interested in computers and program…
It's good they offered the class, but two full semesters of it sounds like terribly inefficient teaching.
What's funny is I don't know what many of the commands are for my text editor. But my fingers know. Sometimes I'll just watch my fingers to see what the command is, but I have to be careful - when I think too much about "what is the command" my fingers forget it.
Re: I Was Wrong About Speed Reading (2015)
#163So, don't bother with Speed Reading.
Re: I Was Wrong About Speed Reading (2015)
#164Not in the sense that i memorized it, and could repeat it word for word, but the gist of it, the point, message, whatever.
It even varies, because sometimes, when i need to recheck some datum mentioned like a point in time, or an amount of something, or a cross reference, i recall exactly where on the page that was, and where that page was. This happens less on screens of any sort, but more so with real paper. Makes no difference if fiction, or non-fiction.
I guess it happens from anywhere from 0,3 to 0,5% of everything i read, it would be up to 5% if i'd only read on real paper. So much for the 'haptics' of 'cyber'...
Anyways, i could read before Kindergarden, because my older Sister tought me, just for fun. I remember the first word i could read was the neon signage of some supermarket called 'Hit', because i asked what it meant. That's how it began.
At the same time this introduced me to the concepts of different languages, different spellings for the same words, and different words for the same things in different languages. Because i'm german, and hit is english.
Early school was often boring torture for me because of that. I could read books and newspapers, and my classmates stuttered along excrutiatingly slow. This lasted maybe to the 6th grade, then they finally caught up(mostly).
Also around that time i finally realized that i had this ability, and it was something special. Interestingly again not in my native language, but in english.
Teacher said go to page xyz and read this, say ready when you are done. I did, and maybe 2 secands later said: 'Ready!' (Was something about the double decker buses in London)
I never read that before (at least not conscious) because everything in that book was boring to me, and of course got reprimanded, which i considered as unfair.
It's like having a photocopy before the 'inner eye' which slowly fades, but not exactly like a photocopy, because then i could read from it and repeat it letter for letter, and word for word, which i can't.
So i'm wondering what do they mean when they talk about 'speed reading', does this include the necessity of memorizing everything, being able to do it anytime, or just the 'lossy' compression of meaning like i (sometimes) do?
In case of the latter, then from my point of view that is like blind people (from birth on) talking about color.
some edits: spelling, structure
Re: I Was Wrong About Speed Reading (2015)
#165Earlier quoted context omitted.
I, as a non-native English speaker who mainly interface English through written language and rarely via spoken language, find this fascinating. I am able to read articles and blog posts in English rapidly and with full comprehension, but I'm totally NOT able to speak out loud most of the words. I find that it's mostly through visual medium the words "come" to me.
That's interesting. I wonder if subvocalisation has been studied in people death since birth.
(sorry for the spam. couldn't resist)
Re: I Was Wrong About Speed Reading (2015)
#166I vocalise everything. It’s usually a lot faster than you’d say it out loud though, probably if I tried to read out loud that fast I’d trip over words.
The secret is rather boring: I’ve just read a lot. I rarely have problems recognising words, so that’s key. For many types of reading I also infer content a lot, and it seems like my brain completes sentences, then I’ll continue on and “jump back” if one of the words was not as expected. I very easily for those tricks where people write “gondolas in Vienna”, so my brain is obviously doing a lot of inference.
I’ll often read the economist cover to cover, and I used to do the same with newspapers where I was young. Maybe reading every single word on such a variety of topics fixes the “surprised by words” category.
My tip is: read thoroughly and carefully and vocalise, read enough and the speed will take care of itself.
Re: I Was Wrong About Speed Reading (2015)
#167I read extremely slowly compared to most, but seem to come up with more insights as well as debunkings. A relative of mine is a natural born speed reader. She can read several 500+ page dense works a day. This is suggested to be impossible. I've personally tested her on her recall after having her quickly digest a work she's never seen before. She has perfect recall and can tell me what page a given passage appeared…
Re: I Was Wrong About Speed Reading (2015)
#168I'm what I've come to call a 'slow thinker'. My perception speed is normal, but the gray matter ticks over at a very slow rate of knots and my comprehension of what I'm seeing/hearing/feeling unpacks over the course of several seconds. I've noticed I often have an initial reaction to things, then a 'slow reaction' that is sometimes quite different and factors in more things I know. It's like it takes some time to 'di…
I'm a bit like this, I think. My raw reading speed is decent. But when I'm reading, I'm constantly stopping to flip back and check something, or to stop and think through the implications of what I've just read, or, when the internet is to hand, to look up some related information. As a result, my net reading speed is diabolical. But to me, this isn't about thinking slowly, it's about thinking thoroughly. I think I p…