Live data from Hacker News

Isotope - An exquisite jQuery plugin for magical layouts

isotope.metafizzy.co

31–40 of 60 posts

Re: Isotope - An exquisite jQuery plugin for magical layouts

#31
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

$37 is a joke. I just purchased it b̶e̶f̶o̶r̶e̶ ̶h̶e̶ ̶r̶e̶a̶l̶i̶z̶e̶s̶ ̶h̶e̶ ̶c̶o̶u̶l̶d̶ ̶c̶h̶a̶r̶g̶e̶ ̶a̶n̶ ̶o̶r̶d̶e̶r̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶m̶a̶g̶n̶i̶t̶u̶d̶e̶ ̶m̶o̶r̶e̶ ̶f̶o̶r̶ ̶t̶h̶i̶s̶ to support further development of this gem.

I'm not really commenting on the price chosen, but the choice to charge for it. I've also created a jQuery plugin or two. I released it for free and now spend a reasonable amount of time answering questions about support, implementation, etc. For some reason in my mind I had always assumed that open source type things have to be done for free: the building, the support, etc. Seeing someone doing something others help…

I'm just one data point but I actually push those "donate"-buttons when I see them on plugins that make my life easier.

Just keep the amount reasonable in relation to the product and don't make me jump through hoops. I.e. just link directly to paypal and if you want to ask me any questions then put that form after the checkout-process where I'm free to ignore it.

Re: Isotope - An exquisite jQuery plugin for magical layouts

#33
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This seems like a neat plugin, but I don't understand all the mega excitement. What am I missing, why is this so earth shattering (read the other comments in this thread)? What is justifying people saying $37 is a "frictionless" price? What are you planning to do that makes you so excited by this?

My thought was that if you need this type of behavior on your site $37 dollars is much less expensive than the amount of time it would take for you to pull all the elements of this together yourself.

Right - my question is who needs this kind of behavior? And why?

Re: Isotope - An exquisite jQuery plugin for magical layouts

#34
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This seems like a neat plugin, but I don't understand all the mega excitement. What am I missing, why is this so earth shattering (read the other comments in this thread)? What is justifying people saying $37 is a "frictionless" price? What are you planning to do that makes you so excited by this?

I think its a combination of the obvious usefulness of this code, combined with the impeccable execution and presentation, combined with its effective employment of bleeding edge technologies. It's basically a "perfect storm" of frontend library awesomeness.

I honestly can't tell if you are being serious or not. If you are: expand on "obvious usefulness."

If you aren't, congrats on telling a joke on HN and still getting upvoted.

Re: Isotope - An exquisite jQuery plugin for magical layouts

#35
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This seems like a neat plugin, but I don't understand all the mega excitement. What am I missing, why is this so earth shattering (read the other comments in this thread)? What is justifying people saying $37 is a "frictionless" price? What are you planning to do that makes you so excited by this?

My thought was that if you need this type of behavior on your site $37 dollars is much less expensive than the amount of time it would take for you to pull all the elements of this together yourself.

[deleted]

Re: Isotope - An exquisite jQuery plugin for magical layouts

#36
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This seems like a neat plugin, but I don't understand all the mega excitement. What am I missing, why is this so earth shattering (read the other comments in this thread)? What is justifying people saying $37 is a "frictionless" price? What are you planning to do that makes you so excited by this?

I think its a combination of the obvious usefulness of this code, combined with the impeccable execution and presentation, combined with its effective employment of bleeding edge technologies. It's basically a "perfect storm" of frontend library awesomeness.

As someone who made the purchase (proof: the license is a pdf/txt) I couldn't have said it better.

Isotope promises to be a goldmine for experimentation and exploration.

Re: Isotope - An exquisite jQuery plugin for magical layouts

#37

Isotope is fairly nice, but it is still missing fluid width on the layout elements. In other words, although it does respond fairly well to horizontal resizing of the browser, it still doesn't do a good job of dynamically adjusting the width of elements horizontally while at the same time stacking them vertically. I made some custom modifications on the original jQuery masonry plugin to get the effect I needed for my…

This site looks great. Seriously, well done.

Re: Isotope - An exquisite jQuery plugin for magical layouts

#39
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

$37 is a joke. I just purchased it b̶e̶f̶o̶r̶e̶ ̶h̶e̶ ̶r̶e̶a̶l̶i̶z̶e̶s̶ ̶h̶e̶ ̶c̶o̶u̶l̶d̶ ̶c̶h̶a̶r̶g̶e̶ ̶a̶n̶ ̶o̶r̶d̶e̶r̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶m̶a̶g̶n̶i̶t̶u̶d̶e̶ ̶m̶o̶r̶e̶ ̶f̶o̶r̶ ̶t̶h̶i̶s̶ to support further development of this gem.

That's a lot of hard work to substitute for the 'strikethru' tag :)

b̶c̶d̶e̶f̶g̶h̶i̶j̶k̶l̶m̶n̶o̶p̶q̶r̶s̶t̶u̶v̶w̶x̶y̶z̶A̶B̶C̶D̶E̶F̶G̶H̶I̶J̶K̶L̶M̶N̶O̶P̶Q̶R̶S̶T̶U̶V̶W̶X̶Y̶Z̶-̶_̶!̶?̶

Re: Isotope - An exquisite jQuery plugin for magical layouts

#40
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My thought was that if you need this type of behavior on your site $37 dollars is much less expensive than the amount of time it would take for you to pull all the elements of this together yourself.

Right - my question is who needs this kind of behavior? And why?

Don't things ever strike you as potentially very useful before you think of a specific use case?

In this case, it's bound to be useful when you're building interfaces for webapps, to let you do new things.

For instance, an onlline clone of Football Manager where gamers want to examine the stats of the players in the other team, but from a whole lot of different perspectives: graphically in formation, or in a list sorted in differrent ways. The animations may not be essential there but they certainly don't hurt. Games compete for their visual fidelity.

Post reply on HN