Linux is a mainframe emulator, it will never be a user-friendly OS. It has spinlocks.
How many are going to take this bait? Fish on!
Linux doesn't have Photoshop
11–20 of 144 posts
Re: Linux doesn't have Photoshop
#12> Krita has all the bases covered, you only need to add these things and I can ditch GIMP/Photoshop.
> The feature you are requesting is probably for Photo editing or manipulating images that are currently not in our focus.
Looks like the author answered their own question as to why some people still aren't happy with the available options. After all, photo editing is what Photoshop was designed to do.
Re: Linux doesn't have Photoshop
#13Nice post about Krita Anyway it would be nice if Linux had Photoshop, why haven’t they done this sometime over the last two decades when people first noticed
Porting to linux isn't worth it.
Cause most of the people who would switch are existing customers. And with the CC model it is never going to happen
Re: Linux doesn't have Photoshop
#14Earlier quoted context omitted.
Honestly because this person is incorrect in their supposition that Krita competes with Photoshop. Gimp competes with Photoshop (extremely poorly), Krita is OSS Corel Painter and it's great at that. They're all image editing tools sure, but the focus is different.
I never said Krita is competing with Photoshop, I just compared them, take a look at the last rant :D
ok but when the title of the article is “linux doesn’t have photoshop” and the article is set up to be an answer to that belief you can understand how some people might be confused
Re: Linux doesn't have Photoshop
#15> Krita has all the bases covered, you only need to add these things and I can ditch GIMP/Photoshop. > The feature you are requesting is probably for Photo editing or manipulating images that are currently not in our focus. Looks like the author answered their own question as to why some people still aren't happy with the available options. After all, photo editing is what Photoshop was designed to do.
You got to be judicious with limited resources, :)
Re: Linux doesn't have Photoshop
#16Linux doesn’t really have a good alternative to InDesign.
For photo editing I find that Darktable & Gimp serve me well enough. Fortunately, I don’t need to worry about CMYK any more.
Re: Linux doesn't have Photoshop
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
I never said Krita is competing with Photoshop, I just compared them, take a look at the last rant :D
ok but when the title of the article is “linux doesn’t have photoshop” and the article is set up to be an answer to that belief you can understand how some people might be confused
I tried to make it as less click baity as I could, but can't resist, :P
Re: Linux doesn't have Photoshop
#18Linux doesn’t really have a good alternative to InDesign. For photo editing I find that Darktable & Gimp serve me well enough. Fortunately, I don’t need to worry about CMYK any more.
Scribus?
Re: Linux doesn't have Photoshop
#19Nice post about Krita Anyway it would be nice if Linux had Photoshop, why haven’t they done this sometime over the last two decades when people first noticed
Porting to linux isn't worth it. Cause most of the people who would switch are existing customers. And with the CC model it is never going to happen
Yes the same reason for the past two decades
If anyone from Adobe is reading this, I would use CC with subscription on linux and advocate for licenses in my whole office if it was an option
Cheers
Re: Linux doesn't have Photoshop
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
Porting to linux isn't worth it. Cause most of the people who would switch are existing customers. And with the CC model it is never going to happen
Yes the same reason for the past two decades If anyone from Adobe is reading this, I would use CC with subscription on linux and advocate for licenses in my whole office if it was an option Cheers
You didn't get it right?
Most of the customers who would switch are already using CC on Mac or Windows so why add the costs of maintenance and support for another platform.
Aside from that, their code base is somewhat quirky, which would definitely increase the cost of porting