Earlier quoted context omitted.
If they cared, they would let you filter for items only sold by Amazon.com and not commingle inventory. What they really want is for others to take all the inventory risk and liability and take a 15% cut of all purchases. They used to let you filter for items sold by Amazon.com, but they removed it, so I think that clearly proves their goal of being a platform rather than a retailer one can rely on for quality goods,…
I can still filter by vendor, at least on the European websites.
Counterfeits on Amazon cost Warren bird feeder business $1.5M
71–80 of 252 posts
Re: Counterfeits on Amazon cost Warren bird feeder business $1.5M
#72When Amazon began selling everything under the sun, the number of vendors exploded. In retrospect, Amazon should have made a big effort to carefully curate all these vendors and their products before listing them on Amazon.com. But that would have been very expensive and no one was telling Amazon they had do that.
The Amazon approach is to move fast and capture market share, without much regard for product quality or ethical concerns. Unfortunately, the rest of the tech industry seems to be following their lead.
Re: Counterfeits on Amazon cost Warren bird feeder business $1.5M
#73Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is the cheap quartz movement that it comes with insufficiently accurate?
Accuracy is mostly fine in my experience, but the battery life is often poor and they tend to be relatively loud. I like quiet, so the noise is more than enough reason to swap the movement when easy imho.
It is miles better than the $5 Ikea clock, but I see no reason to pay more since the $12 one looks good and runs perfectly well.
Re: Counterfeits on Amazon cost Warren bird feeder business $1.5M
#74Isn't this just a market competition if other company's able to make cheaper product out of original idea and does not violate the law?
I was under impression that any product without an IP (copyright, patent, etc) is subject to "counterfeits" case like this.
p.s. I'm not a lawyer
Re: Counterfeits on Amazon cost Warren bird feeder business $1.5M
#75Why aren't these counterfeits and/or Amazon getting sued by the original companies? Isn't this just a market competition if other company's able to make cheaper product out of original idea and does not violate the law? I was under impression that any product without an IP (copyright, patent, etc) is subject to "counterfeits" case like this. p.s. I'm not a lawyer
The counterfeits are probably from China and China doesn't respect foreign IP, and they can probably open hundreds of shell businesses anyway so suing one or Amazon removing one will not help. Amazon has armies of lawyers and will argue they acted whenever they knew something was counterfeit, but as the website is automated they did not know ahead of time.
Counterfeit means it is violating trademark IP, meaning riding on the quality reputation of the brand while not meeting it.
Re: Counterfeits on Amazon cost Warren bird feeder business $1.5M
#76>>In a statement on its website, Amazon also said its employees “work hard every day to help ensure all products offered in our store are safe and authentic.” Bullshit. The front line employees that receive inbound product don't enforce any policy and actually Amazon encourages to deal with disputes only after a product is sold, shipped and a customer complains. That's the Bezos way. Fact. Let's discuss grocery produ…
Re: Counterfeits on Amazon cost Warren bird feeder business $1.5M
#77Link for EU https://outline.com/zCuTHm
Is this relevant to the EU? I see lots of complaints about amazon on the HN frontpage but they mostly focus on the US. I assume tighter regulation and import tariffs on the other side of the atlantic would result in amazon's product selection looking different and perhaps getting counterfeits in is more onerous.
Re: Counterfeits on Amazon cost Warren bird feeder business $1.5M
#78>>In a statement on its website, Amazon also said its employees “work hard every day to help ensure all products offered in our store are safe and authentic.” Bullshit. The front line employees that receive inbound product don't enforce any policy and actually Amazon encourages to deal with disputes only after a product is sold, shipped and a customer complains. That's the Bezos way. Fact. Let's discuss grocery produ…
I am surprised Amazon has not run into Food safety issues / lawsuits by now.
Re: Counterfeits on Amazon cost Warren bird feeder business $1.5M
#79>>In a statement on its website, Amazon also said its employees “work hard every day to help ensure all products offered in our store are safe and authentic.” Bullshit. The front line employees that receive inbound product don't enforce any policy and actually Amazon encourages to deal with disputes only after a product is sold, shipped and a customer complains. That's the Bezos way. Fact. Let's discuss grocery produ…
I am surprised Amazon has not run into Food safety issues / lawsuits by now.
Just 1 of many examples we run into as a fulfillment service.
Merry Christmas everyone!
Re: Counterfeits on Amazon cost Warren bird feeder business $1.5M
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
I am surprised Amazon has not run into Food safety issues / lawsuits by now.
Hard to ship fake perishable goods via Amazon. Food fraud is way more lucrative on bigger scales.