11–20 of 139 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
or legal ones for that matter. I don't think they care about the legality of those they are robbing all that much.
> I don't think they care about the legality of those they are robbing all that much. People robbed of illegal property usually do not report such losses to the authorities.
Off topic, but in Reader View the page seems to apply a Caesar Cipher with shift one on the content after a couple of seconds to make reading annoying.
Maybe it's an extension you've got installed? I wasn't able to reproduce it (on macOS Safari). What reader are you using?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
or legal ones for that matter. I don't think they care about the legality of those they are robbing all that much.
> I don't think they care about the legality of those they are robbing all that much. People robbed of illegal property usually do not report such losses to the authorities.
Does anyone have an alternate source? This site is horrendous on mobile.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I don't think they care about the legality of those they are robbing all that much. People robbed of illegal property usually do not report such losses to the authorities.
but they also would seem to be less likely to have insurance and more likely, as a result, to guard their property with some level of force?
Off topic, but in Reader View the page seems to apply a Caesar Cipher with shift one on the content after a couple of seconds to make reading annoying.
Maybe it's an extension you've got installed? I wasn't able to reproduce it (on macOS Safari). What reader are you using?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I don't think they care about the legality of those they are robbing all that much. People robbed of illegal property usually do not report such losses to the authorities.
Why do you assume it's illegal though? They have legal cannabis in Colorado.