Earlier quoted context omitted.
Imagine how alienating it must be to have no common cultural touchstones to share with other people. We're already there when it comes to music. We have a lot of virtuoso musicianship today. You want top-tier jazz? You can find it. Bossa Nova? Yep. Orchestral arrangements? Those too. Blues and old-school rock? Still being made. But we no longer have music as a common cultural touchstone: everything's been atomized to…
History ended, now culture, what to do...
Can monoculture survive the algorithm?
31–40 of 45 posts
Re: Can monoculture survive the algorithm?
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can see China trying to create a hegemonic Han monoculture: that's what the suppression of Tibet and Uighurs is directed towards.
It's what they've always done. > Mastery of 1 set of texts > Dogmatic adherence to a single school > Promotion of those who regurgitate the above the best It's yet to work for more than a few hundred years.
Re: Can monoculture survive the algorithm?
#33I hope it does not. Imagine how isolating it might feel to be the one person who does not like watching Game of Thrones.
Imagine how alienating it must be to have no common cultural touchstones to share with other people. We're already there when it comes to music. We have a lot of virtuoso musicianship today. You want top-tier jazz? You can find it. Bossa Nova? Yep. Orchestral arrangements? Those too. Blues and old-school rock? Still being made. But we no longer have music as a common cultural touchstone: everything's been atomized to…
Re: Can monoculture survive the algorithm?
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's what they've always done. > Mastery of 1 set of texts > Dogmatic adherence to a single school > Promotion of those who regurgitate the above the best It's yet to work for more than a few hundred years.
Has any power managed to rule for more than a few hundred years?
Re: Can monoculture survive the algorithm?
#35Re: Can monoculture survive the algorithm?
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
rome?
Especially if you include the Eastern Roman Empire which fell in 1453.
In the 1200s, the empire split into 3 warring countries. The one that took Constantinople was considered the continuation of the Byzantine empire, but maybe it's more correct to think of it as a spiritual successor, than an actual unbroken reign of a single nation.
Which would put it at less than 1000 years of rule. So "a few hundred years" would still be an accurate upper bound.
Re: Can monoculture survive the algorithm?
#37Normal drivel from Vox. Friends had a black version, Living Single (which came first) that rated huge for African Americans but non existent for whites, and vice versa. Game of Thrones is a HBO flagship as they have always done. Marvel on the other hand is designed for the Chinese audience. But I have no idea what that means in their markov chain of conflicting thought. I'll go back to watching Netfix's The Witcher,…
The Witcher's DNA is very interesting.
Re: Can monoculture survive the algorithm?
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's what they've always done. > Mastery of 1 set of texts > Dogmatic adherence to a single school > Promotion of those who regurgitate the above the best It's yet to work for more than a few hundred years.
Has any power managed to rule for more than a few hundred years?
Re: Can monoculture survive the algorithm?
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Returning to a monoculture will require both propaganda and suppression Great firewall of China seems to be doing that.
You can see China trying to create a hegemonic Han monoculture: that's what the suppression of Tibet and Uighurs is directed towards.