Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which of the 7 images linked on that page are you referring to? I glanced over the infographics and was underwhelmed. From my perspective as the information-consumer the OP's resume is much better executed than this. The layout and colors on her resume are inviting. The typography and flow works well. I could parse most information without problems, and even felt entertained in the process. The infographics you link…
Let's be careful here. I'm happy to argue about graphic design and will concede up front that I'm not an expert. My criticism of the OP's resume, though, are about the resume infographic as a resume infographic . Like many, many people on HN, I'm certainly qualified to "elaborately bash" a bad resume. Next, while I respect that you might disagree about the Feltron annual reports, it's certainly not a personal quirk t…
Yes and I don't agree with this apples vs oranges comparison, which is why I pointed out how unsuitable the Feltron infographics would be for a resume - no matter how well they may work in the context of an annual report.
The goal of her infographic is to catch attention and force-feed information while glancing. If that resume landed on my desk then I would look at it longer than at most others, simply because it's visually pleasing and interesting (read: different).
I agree that I wouldn't want to receive such a resume for the position of, say, a security researcher or for a (wait for it) infographics designer. But for the position of a web-designer or rails-developer I don't think this deserves the flak you were giving it.