Live data from Hacker News

If Logged into Facebook, Oculus VR Data Will Now Be Used for Ads

extremetech.com

171–180 of 194 posts

Re: If Logged into Facebook, Oculus VR Data Will Now Be Used for Ads

#171

FB ads engineer here. Every time I read these threads, I'm 1. Flattered by how sophisticated HN thinks our systems are (they're not. and we're not that smart. FB's A-team stopped working on ads a long time ago) 2. Entertained by how HN thinks ad targeting works (we don't want to know everything about YOU. we want to know basic info about all of our users.) Hypertargeting doesn't work. Targeting small audiences doesn'…

>Every time I read these threads, I'm 1. Flattered by how sophisticated HN thinks our systems are (they're not. and we're not that smart. FB's A-team stopped working on ads a long time ago) Facebook's money comes primarily from it's ads. https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/120114/how-does-fac... What you're saying seems unlikely >2. Entertained by how HN thinks ad targeting works (we don't want to know everythin…

> whatsapp ... conversations

You seriously believe that the encrypted communications platform that the US government desperately wants a backdoor in is secretly backdoored by Facebook for ads? Something that mundane?

The platform (WhatsApp) that is subject to huge public skepticism, who's source code is so limited in scope that it's probably been audited by every security researcher that is interested in posting a "I found Facebook being evil" blog post?

And you believe they are using this data for ads? The most obvious thing ever to see if you audit/monitor the app?

This is why theories like this borderline paranoia. FUD. Nothing more. Statements like that discredit your entire argument.

-- And yes, of course Facebook uses trackers on sites to figure out what sites you've been to. Of course they use unencrypted data available to them to target ads. Your data is already in their database. Just because it's in another table to allow the "big bad ad agencies" to target you (data the ad agencies can not even see) does not make it any different.

Everyone does this. Everyone will continue doing this. There is absolutely nothing morally wrong with that status quo. The only part that can be morally wrong, is if a human themselves inspects the database without respect for privacy.

And this is why we have laws for dealing with malicious employees, robberies, house break-ins, etc. Things happen whether it's online or offline. All of this was possible (arguably even more so) before Facebook. It's just more centralized now.

This paranoia simply needs to stop.

EDIT: Adding, it makes complete sense that Facebook's A-team is not working on ads. Taking a page from Google: Diversification. Ads are auto-pilot income, have hit their tech ceiling, and Facebook's longevity depends on investment outside of their core business. I am unaware how this is so unbelievable to some.

Re: If Logged into Facebook, Oculus VR Data Will Now Be Used for Ads

#172

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Every time I read these threads, I'm 1. Flattered by how sophisticated HN thinks our systems are (they're not. and we're not that smart. FB's A-team stopped working on ads a long time ago) Facebook's money comes primarily from it's ads. https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/120114/how-does-fac... What you're saying seems unlikely >2. Entertained by how HN thinks ad targeting works (we don't want to know everythin…

> whatsapp ... conversations You seriously believe that the encrypted communications platform that the US government desperately wants a backdoor in is secretly backdoored by Facebook for ads ? Something that mundane? The platform (WhatsApp) that is subject to huge public skepticism, who's source code is so limited in scope that it's probably been audited by every security researcher that is interested in posting a "…

Facebook doesn't need to backdoor your encrypted messages to use WhatsApp for ads, there's still a lot of interesting data they can get based just on the metadata of who you converse with.

And that's not paranoia, it's openly something that Facebook is doing right now[0].

> In a blogpost, WhatsApp announced it would begin sharing names and phone numbers with its parent company, to allow its more than 1 billion users “to communicate with businesses that matter to you too” – like notifications from airlines, delivery services or your bank, for example.

> Facebook will also use that data to make friend suggestions and combine that data with the reams of information it has already collected so that it can tailor ads even more specifically to your interests.

If you think that Facebook isn't mining WhatsApp data for ads, you aren't paying enough attention to Facebook. I don't think they've backdoored the E2E encryption (though it wouldn't surprise me if in the future they started doing on-device keyword detection for ads, which wouldn't technically require them to insert a backdoor). But it doesn't really matter, they don't need to go that far.

> Everyone does this. Everyone will continue doing this. There is absolutely nothing morally wrong with that status quo.

This is how all of these conversations always go. Privacy advocates are paranoid crazy people, until it turns out that companies are spying on you. Then suddenly the argument is that the status quo is fine and the controls are great and everyone always knew they were being recorded, and why is everyone making a big deal about it?

If you're frustrated that people come up with crazy theories about Facebook turning on their microphones, those theories might exist because smart TVs and mobile devices already use audio to track you[1]. Every time that someone raises an alarm on a privacy violation, and people tell them they're paranoid, and then the paranoid people turn out to be right, the theories about tracking get a little bolder in response.

If advertisers want the paranoia to stop, maybe they should stop giving people reasons to be paranoid. The current state of privacy conspiracy theories is entirely, 100% the fault of the advertising industry and other mass data-collection industries and government departments.

[0]: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/aug/25/whatsapp-...

[1]: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/11/beware-of-ads-th...

Re: If Logged into Facebook, Oculus VR Data Will Now Be Used for Ads

#173

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Please don’t suggest people are astroturfing here. It’s against the site guidelines.

This is a site guideline I fervently disagree with. Throwaways with no reputation to back them up should be treated as irrelevant - they don't face any social costs and indeed they accomplish their goal almost immediately and there is no mechanism, none whatsoever, to undo their damage. The problem is the fundamental information disparity. The guidelines want us to treat anonymous astroturfers with the same deference…

You're only counting the cost of one side. Anything will look bad if you evaluate it that way.

The other side is that internet users massively project "astroturfing", "shill", "spy", "foreign agent" and so on, onto other commenters and opinions they happen not to like. That's actually the larger problem; in fact, based on countless hours I've spent investigating these phenomena on HN, it is overwhelmingly the larger problem. It's not a close call.

Users taking such cheap shots at each other degrades discussion in really bad ways, so we don't allow it unless they have some basis for what they say. If you look closely at how often it comes up, you'll see that people almost never provide any basis—not a glimmer of anything objective—beyond just disliking what someone else said. Someone posting an opposing opinion on the internet is evidence of nothing but that people have differing views. That is no basis for denouncing someone as a traitor or a criminal, least of all on a site that asks users to be kind and thoughtful and make substantive comments.

So HN's rule is that it's not ok to lob such accusations, or insinuate them, unless there's something more than pure imagination to go on. If people are worried, they are welcome to contact us; we investigate, and if the data gives some reason to conclude that abuse is happening, we crack down on it. But if we look and find no evidence of manipulation, we don't. That seems obviously the right policy to me. The alternative would be to punish users without evidence. That wouldn't be right.

Does that mean we're vulnerable to super sneaks who manipulate the site so cleverly as to leave no traces in the data? Yes, any internet community is vulnerable to that. The best we can do as a community to defend against that is to do what we should be doing anyway: refute bad arguments.

There is a ton of previous explanation of why we moderate HN this way in the archives: https://hn.algolia.com/?sort=byDate&dateRange=all&type=comme....

Re: If Logged into Facebook, Oculus VR Data Will Now Be Used for Ads

#174

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> whatsapp ... conversations You seriously believe that the encrypted communications platform that the US government desperately wants a backdoor in is secretly backdoored by Facebook for ads ? Something that mundane? The platform (WhatsApp) that is subject to huge public skepticism, who's source code is so limited in scope that it's probably been audited by every security researcher that is interested in posting a "…

Facebook doesn't need to backdoor your encrypted messages to use WhatsApp for ads, there's still a lot of interesting data they can get based just on the metadata of who you converse with. And that's not paranoia, it's openly something that Facebook is doing right now[0]. > In a blogpost, WhatsApp announced it would begin sharing names and phone numbers with its parent company, to allow its more than 1 billion users…

These types of companies won't get any good press no matter what they do. Everyone will find some way to justify their actions as evil. Everyone will find some way to say "they are still evil on the inside, just pretending not to be." People are not understanding this encourages these companies to stay the same. You can not satisfy those who do not want satisfaction.

But let's attack this argument on a technical level again: The data you speak of already resides in Facebook's database. There is no privacy implications of them using data, your messages, your pictures, and metadata that is already in their database or one of their children companies databases, for ads.

The only data you could question is trackers on third-party sides, but the "everyone else is doing it" argument makes it silly for Facebook to not do so as well to compete considering the reach that they have. Call that a weak excuse, but they are offering a free product in exchange for translating to money and are one of the few social startups that have actually been able to pull it off without hemorrhaging money.

The amount of press for example that Facebook has received the last 2 years on almost completely FUD topics is absolutely astounding. Cambridge Analytica was even FUD, and is still to this day misunderstood. Cambridge Analytica leaked data from your Facebook account via an exploit and phishing. This was a feature designed to give developers more opportunities. The amount of damage this has done to real legitimate apps in the Facebook ecosystem can not be understated, and since then Facebook's product quality has backpedalled considerably. All because the media spun this incorrectly, did not understand the technical details at hand, and pushed responsibility onto Facebook.

My 2 cents: We need to focus on the facts. There are real problems with privacy in society, and we are wasting so much time focusing on misunderstood problems to focus on the real ones. These are not scandals. These are weak news days.

Issues like this get all the limelight, make all the headlines, and reduce visibility to actual real life problems incl. those related to privacy. That needs to stop.

Re: If Logged into Facebook, Oculus VR Data Will Now Be Used for Ads

#175
post #169

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Facebook's not helping this conspiracy theory with their "why did I see this ad?" dialog. I'll see a clearly hyper-targeted ad (for example, a psoriasis medication) and click that button and it'll say "they wanted to reach people in the United States between 18-65!" I know I was targeted by that ad. I know they're just showing me the most general bit of the targeting info that was used to put that ad in front of me.…

I am a professional FB advertiser. The advertisers are probably choosing to target everyone on FB in that age range, but asking FB to optimize for conversions. Then the FB algorithm finds more people who look like people who are clicking and converting.

Ok, so dumb question. Why _wouldn't_ you optimize for conversions then? Unless you want some immeasurable branding value type lift.

Sorry for the dumb question but if you're implying one particular bidding mechanism benefits from FB algorithmic experience in a way that's meaningfully more accurate (serving the ad to the guy or girl with the condition), why would anyone do anything different?

Re: If Logged into Facebook, Oculus VR Data Will Now Be Used for Ads

#176
post #169

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am a professional FB advertiser. The advertisers are probably choosing to target everyone on FB in that age range, but asking FB to optimize for conversions. Then the FB algorithm finds more people who look like people who are clicking and converting.

Ok, so dumb question. Why _wouldn't_ you optimize for conversions then? Unless you want some immeasurable branding value type lift. Sorry for the dumb question but if you're implying one particular bidding mechanism benefits from FB algorithmic experience in a way that's meaningfully more accurate (serving the ad to the guy or girl with the condition), why would anyone do anything different?

Almost everyone who cares about performance does bid for conversions. Sometimes companies add extra layers of targeting on top of it though.

Re: If Logged into Facebook, Oculus VR Data Will Now Be Used for Ads

#177

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Facebook doesn't need to backdoor your encrypted messages to use WhatsApp for ads, there's still a lot of interesting data they can get based just on the metadata of who you converse with. And that's not paranoia, it's openly something that Facebook is doing right now[0]. > In a blogpost, WhatsApp announced it would begin sharing names and phone numbers with its parent company, to allow its more than 1 billion users…

These types of companies won't get any good press no matter what they do. Everyone will find some way to justify their actions as evil. Everyone will find some way to say "they are still evil on the inside, just pretending not to be." People are not understanding this encourages these companies to stay the same. You can not satisfy those who do not want satisfaction. But let's attack this argument on a technical leve…

> But let's attack this argument on a technical level again: The data you speak of already resides in Facebook's database. There is no privacy implications of them using data, your messages, your pictures, and metadata that is already in their database or one of their children companies databases, for ads.

The GDPR begs to differ. By that logic, your web hosted would also be free to take your server logs and database contents and use them for their own purposes, since it's already on their server. Would you be fine with that?

But ok, assuming your argument were right, wouldn't then the rational thing be to contribute as little data as possible to tech companies' databases? And yet all industry trends, cloud advocates, IoT providers and modern IT projects in general point in the other direction.

Re: If Logged into Facebook, Oculus VR Data Will Now Be Used for Ads

#180

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Facebook doesn't need to backdoor your encrypted messages to use WhatsApp for ads, there's still a lot of interesting data they can get based just on the metadata of who you converse with. And that's not paranoia, it's openly something that Facebook is doing right now[0]. > In a blogpost, WhatsApp announced it would begin sharing names and phone numbers with its parent company, to allow its more than 1 billion users…

These types of companies won't get any good press no matter what they do. Everyone will find some way to justify their actions as evil. Everyone will find some way to say "they are still evil on the inside, just pretending not to be." People are not understanding this encourages these companies to stay the same. You can not satisfy those who do not want satisfaction. But let's attack this argument on a technical leve…

> But let's attack this argument on a technical level again: The data you speak of already resides in Facebook's database. There is no privacy implications of them using data, your messages, your pictures, and metadata that is already in their database or one of their children companies databases, for ads.

On a related note, my lawyer already knows where the money is buried, so are there any privacy implications in him giving the police a few tips? Privacy isn't just about who has my data -- it's about how my data gets used.

The use of ads to target me against my will, or to allow other people to target me against my will is a violation. Facebook does share data with other companies, but even if they didn't, there's no practical difference between a company targeting me directly based on my data and a company asking Facebook to target me based on the same data. Facebook is just acting as a proxy.

Post reply on HN