ACLU sues Homeland Security over 'stingray' cell phone surveillance
1–10 of 163 posts
Re: ACLU sues Homeland Security over 'stingray' cell phone surveillance
#2Stingrays have been known to be used by law enforcement for a decade now. It's about bloody time more information than just "they are used" is opened to the public.
Re: ACLU sues Homeland Security over 'stingray' cell phone surveillance
#3Presumably Homeland Security and its child agencies are targeting everybody within 100 miles of a border (~65% of the population) with any and every form of surveillance they can think of, because why not? It's very legal, and very cool.
Re: ACLU sues Homeland Security over 'stingray' cell phone surveillance
#4Presumably Homeland Security and its child agencies are targeting everybody within 100 miles of a border (~65% of the population) with any and every form of surveillance they can think of, because why not? It's very legal, and very cool.
Well they’re targeting incoming presidents of the USA for any reason so why not everyone else as well?
Re: ACLU sues Homeland Security over 'stingray' cell phone surveillance
#5Is it just me, or has the ACLU been on a roll lately? I'm really enjoying its current direction. It might have just been that the most controversial headlines were getting the most airtime, but it seemed to be going off the tracks for a while.
Re: ACLU sues Homeland Security over 'stingray' cell phone surveillance
#6[dead]
Re: ACLU sues Homeland Security over 'stingray' cell phone surveillance
#7Presumably Homeland Security and its child agencies are targeting everybody within 100 miles of a border (~65% of the population) with any and every form of surveillance they can think of, because why not? It's very legal, and very cool.
> It's very legal, and very cool.
With who? I'd really like to know who is copacetic with this kind of surveillance state.
Re: ACLU sues Homeland Security over 'stingray' cell phone surveillance
#8Presumably Homeland Security and its child agencies are targeting everybody within 100 miles of a border (~65% of the population) with any and every form of surveillance they can think of, because why not? It's very legal, and very cool.
> It's very legal, and very cool. With who? I'd really like to know who is copacetic with this kind of surveillance state.
Re: ACLU sues Homeland Security over 'stingray' cell phone surveillance
#9Presumably Homeland Security and its child agencies are targeting everybody within 100 miles of a border (~65% of the population) with any and every form of surveillance they can think of, because why not? It's very legal, and very cool.
> It's very legal, and very cool. With who? I'd really like to know who is copacetic with this kind of surveillance state.
Cool as in "tacticool," like driving military surplus IED-hardened vehicles around for small town policing.
Re: ACLU sues Homeland Security over 'stingray' cell phone surveillance
#10Is it just me, or has the ACLU been on a roll lately? I'm really enjoying its current direction. It might have just been that the most controversial headlines were getting the most airtime, but it seemed to be going off the tracks for a while.
They're "on a roll" lately because there's been egregious overstepping of government against free speech.