31–40 of 61 posts
Usually I don’t mind reposting my articles but with a direct reference to original at the beginning https://vas3k.com/blog/computational_photography/ Let’s be respectful to the original author, I spent couple of months writing it:(
Usually I don’t mind reposting my articles but with a direct reference to original at the beginning https://vas3k.com/blog/computational_photography/ Let’s be respectful to the original author, I spent couple of months writing it:(
Flagging this. Paging dang for a link change and a ban on letsenhance.io.
Flagging this. Paging dang for a link change and a ban on letsenhance.io.
What's the problem with letsenhance.io? Honest question. I skimmed the article and didn't see anything off-putting.
Oh, and stealing ad revenue from the original creator.
Usually I don’t mind reposting my articles but with a direct reference to original at the beginning https://vas3k.com/blog/computational_photography/ Let’s be respectful to the original author, I spent couple of months writing it:(
> The beauty of the situation is that we can't even imagine today what it's going to be.
Optical phased arrays of nanoantennas?
Usually I don’t mind reposting my articles but with a direct reference to original at the beginning https://vas3k.com/blog/computational_photography/ Let’s be respectful to the original author, I spent couple of months writing it:(
Hi Vas3k! My name is Kate and I am Head of Content at Let's Enhance. We are very thankful for the given material, because it's highly related to us. And I want to clarify this unpleasant situation: I've directly talked with the author of the article - Vas3k and asked for the permission to publish this awesome material. I can attach the screenshots of our conversation. All the copyrights are reserved. We mentioned you…
>We mentioned you and your blog as the original source.
Just because you reference a work it doesn't mean it's not plagiarism when you straight up copy most of the content.
This article is completely, utterly wrong as soon as it starts talking about anything plenoptic. Please disregard after that point as there are serious factual errors, particularly regarding what Google did or didn't do with Lytro. (Source: I'm in the VR / plenoptic space, knew a bunch of people at Lytro, some of whom are now at Google. Timelines and facts do not match this article's assertions.)
Flagging this. Paging dang for a link change and a ban on letsenhance.io.
What's the problem with letsenhance.io? Honest question. I skimmed the article and didn't see anything off-putting.
Usually I don’t mind reposting my articles but with a direct reference to original at the beginning https://vas3k.com/blog/computational_photography/ Let’s be respectful to the original author, I spent couple of months writing it:(
Hi Vas3k! My name is Kate and I am Head of Content at Let's Enhance. We are very thankful for the given material, because it's highly related to us. And I want to clarify this unpleasant situation: I've directly talked with the author of the article - Vas3k and asked for the permission to publish this awesome material. I can attach the screenshots of our conversation. All the copyrights are reserved. We mentioned you…
It is more appropriate to a preamble stating that the following images and text are directly copied from the original author.
Saying we are thankful for "given materials" is too vague (and probably offensive to the original author) when all the images, text, and even structure of the article is a copy.