21–30 of 72 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Really? I stopped at the second one and decided to read this thread instead (where the currently top voted comment is a pertinent summary)
That's still twice the page views that they would have received if it was all on one page.
A great bunch of ideas but hopeless presentation. Why the heck does Forbes use this slideshow style of presenting ? Loved the rent-a-green box idea and also the socks subscription :). Who could've thought about socks and underwear subscription, really :). Thanks for posting.
If they want the page views, put each company on a seperate page, but don't pretend that the pictures count for more than 1% of the interesting aspect of this feature, and don't use a terrible slideshow system that makes it actually annoying to read the text.
Last one is impressive. At $7000 a day the guy only has to work 143 days to reach a million per year.
Nice list, hated they way they were shown.
They just got 20 times the amount of page views though. If they provided a list that means you could have skipped through and decreased their page views.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
They just got 20 times the amount of page views though. If they provided a list that means you could have skipped through and decreased their page views.
I wish people would stop worrying about page views, its a broken metric, always has been.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wish people would stop worrying about page views, its a broken metric, always has been.
It's not a broken metric when you're selling ad impressions on each page view. It's how you make money.
the numbers are inaccurate, varying wildly depending on how you measure it (web server logs, analytics, etc), and its a horrible way for advertiser to measure ROI.
I hope they become available in my state next time I have to move.
I must be really sleepy. I clicked on the article thinking ... 20 million "dollar businesses" ... wtf? Parse Error. Need more caffeine.