Earlier quoted context omitted.
> This is one of those cultural ideas embedded in XXI Century logic which only does harm and transmits the wrong message: people’s life is as valuable as the money the work or the “job” they have, and of course, caring for the family is not a proper job. First off, what if someone doesn't want to be a stay at home parent? Why force traditional values on them? But, in terms of pure economics, let's put it at an extrem…
I'm not sure . In a very large share of people work either in bullshit jobs or unnecessary jobs or are replacablable. On the other hand, if children would get more love,maybe more of them would grow to be exceptional?
And of course someone could have a BS job and then later move on to a job that does have an impact!
Trying to evaluate the worth of people is pretty much futile, and whenever it has been attempted there have been huge negative outcomes.
And even during less extreme historical circumstances, it is just expensive to do, the recent example being drug testing for welfare recipients. The cost to do the drug testing far exceeded the money the government saved denying benefits.
In the end being non-judgemental and treating people equally turns out to be a rather economically efficient solution.