Live data from Hacker News

No to Chrome

notochrome.org

241–250 of 319 posts

Re: No to Chrome

#241

They really miss an opportunity to say WHY anywhere on the landing page, instead going straight to: "Chrome is bad. Here's some alternatives."

Even the WHY page is bad. It only states that "google is bad" "they are not your friends". Okay, proof, cases, overwhelming evidence that would force people to stop?

Re: No to Chrome

#242
Also remember that many "other" browsers are also based on Chrome or just customized Chrome versions. Think Opera, Brave, Vivaldi etc.

Re: No to Chrome

#243
post #143
post #134

Earlier quoted context omitted.

“Originally” if I recall correctly, Chrome was a fork of firefox right? That is a long time ago though!

Nope. It was a fork of WebKit which was a fork of KHTML, the engine powering Konqueror. KHTML was developed by the KDE team. Edit: It was widely speculated that Apple would use gecko for Safari and a shock when they announced they would use the relatively little known KHTML engine. The decision was based on KHTML having much cleaner code. I haven't looked at the Mozilla code in many years, but it was pretty gnarly ba…

I went looking into this, and it appears that I was confused. Google was a big contributor to Firefox in the early naughties, which is the period I was thinking of. Chrome didn't come out until a good while later.

Re: No to Chrome

#244
post #137
post #76

Interesting, I just moved back to Firefox after many years of using Chrome. I have to admit, it has gotten a lot faster recently, Firefox sync is working very well, and the Firefox Android app is a pleasure to use (being able to install uBlock origin is a huge plus). Anything else I missed on Chrome was easily solved by an addon, or a small tweak on userChrome.css (customizing the browser interface by overriding its…

I can’t solve highlighting search results in the scroll bar, and apparently I search a surprising amount and am absolutely crippled without scroll bar highlighting, so I’ll stick to Chrome until I can’t (e.g. when content blocking is crippled).

I literally just noticed Chrome did this after reading this post. lol

Re: No to Chrome

#245

Earlier quoted context omitted.

it's literally the same engine as chrome. the only reason i use chrome is for the dev tools.

FF just got web socket inspectors so I really don't know what chrome dev tools has now. Everything about ff dev tools is better. Especially looking at css layouts.

CSS is better in Firefox. They also used to ship a web audio api debugger. The new scratchpad is nice too. Does 80% of what I need.

But Chromes debugger and performance analysis still is a lot more capable.

Re: No to Chrome

#248
post #58
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

People need wayfinding regardless of how you get around.

Yeah, Google Maps is surprisingly good when you are on a foreign trip and need to find which bus you need to take to get somewhere. There are probably better country-specific apps to do the same, but GM works in all sorts of countries like Hungary or Japan.

not so well in bulgaria, just not im serbia

Re: No to Chrome

#250

I’m quite satisfied with my move away from google products. Moved from gmail to protonmail. Chrome to firefox and search to ddg. Ddg isn’t perfect though and I find myself using !g tag more often than I’d like.

How do you search through mail in protonmail? Due to the nature of end-to-end encryption, online search features are very limited. You can't build an index if you can't read the data.

Do you download everything and search offline? Or maybe, unlike me, you don't rely on search so much?

Post reply on HN