> Stories about Sergey and Brin are longstanding and easily researchable
And all happened a long time ago, e.g. Brin's dalliance with Hugo Barra's girlfriend, so why would he resign years after this happened?
> And Larry Page is who paid Rubin $90 million
Again, Page didn't personally pay Rubin, this was part of Rubin's exit-contract, approved by the board, and why would this cause Page to resign specifically, and not Sundar?
> The boys club at the Alphabet C-level goes to the very, very top, and it would be impossible to address Drummond without addressing Page and Brin.
Pretty much the "boys club" extends everywhere in corporate America (and politics), pretty much anytime men get a lot of money or power, they tend go off looking for lots of sex.
But you're alleging that they are both resigning simultaneously because of some scandal that's about to be unearthed related to sexual harassment. Everything you've brought up have been known for years and are not revelations and so are already 'priced in' to the board reputation.
Most Googlers know and have felt that Larry and Sergey have been 'checked out' for years and are no longer interested in the day to day direction of Alphabet as a business. They barely ever attend company events.
So what's more likely:
a) They're rich and bored and want to go off and do other things
or
b) they's suddenly resigning for behavior that was documented years ago (Brin's affair while married, Page dating Marissa, etc, or paying off C-suite execs). In fact, rank-and-file Googlers didn't even demand their resignation when the Rubin $90 million exit happened. There's no pressure on them to resign over that.
or
c) some secret scandalous sexual escapade that happens to involve both of them is about to be unearthed but yet is unsupported by anything you've linked.
I think you have to admit that your claims are both salacious and exceedingly unlikely, and this is very likely a bunch of multibillionaires long bored with management. You've made very specific claims that their resignations are being driven by some sexual harassment claim.
This claim is baseless until you present evidence.